
U.S. House of Representatives - District 52
District 52 — U.S. House of Representatives
Get the facts on the California candidates running for election to the District 52 — U.S. House of Representatives
Find out their top 3 priorities, their experience, and who supports them.
About this office
News and links
News
Candidates
- Pursuing and enacting bipartisan solutions to climate...
- Preserving and improving affordable healthcare for...
- Safeguarding American liberties by curbing Presidential...
Jim DeBello
Encourage this candidate to share their information on Voter's Edge.
- Addressing the climate emergency by passing the Green...
- protecting reproductive freedom
- Medicare for All
- Ending illegal immigration
- Stopping sewage from Mexico that closes our beaches...
- Growing wages for Americans by reducing foreign labor,...
My Top 3 Priorities
- Pursuing and enacting bipartisan solutions to climate change.
- Preserving and improving affordable healthcare for working families.
- Safeguarding American liberties by curbing Presidential lawlessness and supporting our system of justice and independent judiciary.
Experience
Experience
Education
Biography
Scott Peters is a proven leader with a track record of working with everyone to achieve common sense solutions and get things done. Since becoming a member the U.S. House of Representatives in 2013, his priorities have been to fix a broken Congress, create high-quality jobs, keep America safe, keep our promises to our veterans, and make college more affordable for middle-class families. Since his time on the City Council, and as a Port Commissioner, Scott has developed a solid reputation as someone who is willing to reach across the aisle and achieve bipartisan solutions to tough problems.
Before being elected to Congress, Scott served as chair of the San Diego Unified Port District – a major economic engine that produces tens of thousands of high-skill, high-wage jobs for San Diegans. The Port manages the state tidelands in and around San Diego Bay, which produces around $3.3 billion in direct economic impact to the region and supports middle-class jobs for around 40,000 San Diegans.
Scott served at the Port after completing two terms on the San Diego City Council, where he was San Diego’s first City Council President, elected to the role three years in a row by his colleagues. While at the City, Scott pursued greater accountability and efficiency in government, with a results-oriented approach. He led the creation of a new council/mayor form of government with an independent budget review function; created an independent audit function; hired the City’s first independent budget analyst; completed over $2 billion in downtown redevelopment including a new major league ballpark that generated more than 19,000 jobs; delivered an 80% reduction in sewer spills and beach closure days; set new standards for energy and water conservation in new development; and completed major district infrastructure, including Highway 56.
Prior to entering public service, Scott had a 16-year legal career in private practice, specializing in environmental law. He worked as an associate at large law firms, as a Deputy County Counsel for the County of San Diego, and then had his own small law firm for a number of years.
Scott has also worked extensively as a community leader to grow our economy, improve education, and protect the environment – including service as a member of the boards of the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, CleanTECH San Diego, and the UCSD Chancellor’s Community Advisory Board, and as Chair of the Climate Initiative at The San Diego Foundation.
Scott earned his undergraduate degree from Duke University and worked as an economist for the United States Environmental Protection Agency before attending New York University School of Law. He and his wife of 33 years, Lynn, are 31-year residents of the 52nd District. They live in La Jolla, and have a grown daughter and son.
Who supports this candidate?
Organizations (11)
Questions & Answers
Questions from League of Women Voters of California (3)
There are many potential funding streams for infrastructure projects, but the most important funding stream is the one that can be enacted so that we can begin to make long-needed improvements to our infrastructure.
In addition to utilizing existing project-specific funding options like the Passenger Facility Charge for airports and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for ports, Congress should evaluate whether current fees associated with power generation are at appropriate levels.
Notably, it is important not only to infrastructure projects, but also to stave off the worst effects of climate change that Congress establish some form of carbon fee. Setting a price on carbon will help increase revenue from power generation that puts carbon into the atmosphere. It could be refundable for families and small businesses, and it could potentially replace the gas tax.
These types of fees are not a panacea. Congress should debate concepts like establishing fees for vehicle miles traveled, fees on the movement of goods or freight, and even increasing the corporate tax rate.
While the Affordable Care Act is not perfect, I have long supported its goals to deliver affordable, accessible medical care to those who need it. In 2017, I was proud to stand up against Republican efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, including the elimination of protections for people with pre-existing conditions, in first a 27-hour markup in the Energy and Commerce Committee and then again on the floor. Instead of sabotaging healthcare for those who need it most, I believe that Congress should take steps to strengthen the Affordable Care Act to keep premiums down for families in San Diego and around the country. To that end, I introduced legislation to establish dedicated federal funding for reinsurance programs that help states keep premiums down. I have also supported efforts to support advertising around open enrollment periods to get as many healthy people into risk pools as possible and support creating a public option, one in which, for example, people could buy into Medicare. Finally, one of the keys to ensuring that healthcare is affordable is addressing out of pocket costs for the drugs we all need to lead healthy lives. While I am concerned that elements of H.R.3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act would have a chilling effect on innovation, I ultimately supported the bill to help deliver lower drug costs for families. However, recognizing that H.R.3 is unlikely to become law in the current Congressional make up, I am focused on identifying bipartisan solutions to bring down drug prices for families now, because those who are struggling to afford their life-saving medicines can’t afford to wait for Congress. To that end, I have supported measures to speed up bureaucratic approvals of generic drugs, have introduced legislation to create an incentive for doctors to prescribe lower-cost biosimilar drugs under Medicare Part B, and helped pass legislation that would remove roadblocks to the research and development of generic alternatives to some of our costliest medicines.
During my first term in Congress, a bipartisan group of Senators passed S.744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act out of the Senate and sent it to the House for consideration. Sadly, then-Speaker Boehner refused to allow the House to vote on that measure. That bill would have substantively addressed many of the immigration issues we continue to confront today: lack of status for young people and families who know no other country as their home, concerns over drug smuggling and human trafficking across our southern border, establishing a rigorous pathway to citizenship for those who are currently present in the United States illegally, among many others. I was a cosponsor of the House’s version of that legislation, and wish that we had the opportunity to pass that bill out of the House to send on to President Obama for signature. Today, we continue to need solutions to questions of status for Dreamers and those who are currently present illegally. We need to invest in smart, targeted border security instead of a medieval wall that will do nothing to stem the flow of migrants toward our borders. We need to reform the process for recruiting and retaining highly skilled immigrants, in addition to evaluating the labor needs of all our economic sectors. And, sadly, we now need to address the horrors present in our immigration system established by this Administration—prohibiting the separation of children and families, ending the practice of holding migrants in camps in Mexico, among others. As with any major legislation, if it is to be lasting, it must have bipartisan support, and I would work to ensure that fixing our broken immigration system is a bipartisan process.
Who gave money to this candidate?
Contributions
Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:
More information about contributions
By State:
By Size:
By Type:
Political Beliefs
Political Philosophy
While so many in Washington seem interested only in political gamesmanship and blaming others for the problems we face, Scott has forged a different path. He has introduced multiple bills to make college more affordable, has become a nationally-recognized leader in the fight to reduce gun violence, has been a strong voice for our nation’s military, and has repeatedly stood up to attempts in Congress to take away a woman’s right to make her own healthcare decisions.
Videos (5)
Rep. Scott Peters supports common-sense gun safety reforms to reduce senseless gun violence.
Rep. Scott Peters passed a bill to help address the tragic epidemic of veteran suicide.
Why Barack Obama endorsed Scott Peters' re-election to Congress in 2016.
Rep. Scott Peters on a woman's right to make her own health care decisions.
Candidate Contact Info
Who supports this candidate?
Organizations (1)
Who gave money to this candidate?
Contributions
Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:
More information about contributions
By State:
By Size:
By Type:
Candidate Contact Info
My Top 3 Priorities
- Addressing the climate emergency by passing the Green New Deal
- protecting reproductive freedom
- Medicare for All
Who gave money to this candidate?
Contributions
Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:
More information about contributions
By State:
By Size:
By Type:
Candidate Contact Info
My Top 3 Priorities
- Ending illegal immigration
- Stopping sewage from Mexico that closes our beaches on average 135 days per year.
- Growing wages for Americans by reducing foreign labor, especially H-1B visas
Experience
Experience
Education
Biography
Ryan Cunningham was born in La Jolla, California and attended public school in La Jolla and Carmel Valley prior to graduating from Mira Mesa High School. His mother was a special education teacher in the San Diego Unified School District and his father a professor and men’s basketball coach at UCSD. In 2006, like so many, he fled California’s regressive agenda and relocated to San Antonio, Texas for the booming economy, low cost of living, and no state personal income tax. Ryan has served as a financial advisor and underwriter to municipalities throughout Texas and California, including many economically disadvantaged communities. His experience includes financing infrastructure projects for public-private partnerships, health care districts, school districts, cities, counties, utilities, and special districts; he has refinanced existing debt and lowered taxes. Mr. Cunningham has also served as a consultant to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative in Geneva, Switzerland in the fields of development and environmental finance: asset and liability management, portfolio decarbonization, green bonds, natural capital, energy efficiency, and responsible investing. Mr. Cunningham was a credit analyst for Latin American infrastructure and project finance transactions with an emphasis on cross-border transportation and energy projects in Peru, Argentina, and Mexico. He has worked in Mexico and across three different continents and is currently a public finance underwriter.
Mr. Cunningham holds an Associate of Arts from Palomar College in San Marcos, CA and a Bachelor of Science from St. Vincent College in Latrobe, PA; Mr. Cunningham was a member of both the men’s intercollegiate baseball and basketball teams at Palomar College and St. Vincent College. He earned a Master of Public Affairs with a concentration in public finance and trade, along with a Master of Arts in Caribbean and Latin American Studies from Indiana University Bloomington. Mr. Cunningham completed his graduate studies at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in Santiago, Chile while interning for the Chilean American Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Cunningham has a certificate in Climate and Renewable Energy from Frankfurt (Germany) School of Banking and Management.
Mr. Cunningham is an advanced Spanish and an intermediate French speaker and has traveled extensively. He is an avid backpacker and camper, enjoying our nation’s greatest national parks and wildernesses.
Questions & Answers
Questions from League of Women Voters of California (3)
There is a role for the federal government to supplement financing for projects, but project prioritization should be done at the local level. Funding of infrastructure from the federal government should be free of coercion that infringes upon the rights of citizens to organize their communities in the manner they prefer. Any future funding of infrastructure projects should:
1. Mobilize resources to eliminate sewage spills from the Tijuana River. This includes utilizing the public private partnership framework in Mexico that will incentive Mexico to pay for the necessary infrastructure improvements. An availability-based project that only pays the operator of the sewage infrastructure if no sewage comes into the US is appropriate. Mexico has utilized this method of funding under its recenlty implemented public private partnership framework for numerous road rehabilitation projects throughout the country. The key is to align incentives and appropriately transfer the risk away from the U.S.
2. Increase cap of bank qualified debt which provides municipalities with lower borrowing costs from the current $10M annually to $30M.
2. Federal funding for infrastructure projects will not be tied to development, especially increasing housing density.
3. Continue support for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act and Transportation Infrastructure and Innovation Act loan programs.
4. Protect tax-exempt status of municipal bonds and reinstate tax-exempt advance refundings that were eliminated with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
5. Expand federal monies available to state development and infrastructure banks that will allow for greater project prioritization at the state and local level.
Our health care system must return to the free market principles of individual choice and increased competition that are proven to lower costs and provide better service. This will empower individuals to make the health care choices that are best for them, not government bureaucrats or giant health monopolies that are engaged in crony capitalism. I support portability of insurance when leaving a job, purchasing across state lines, transparent pricing for services and medication, and the ability of consumers to know in advance what the total cost of services will be, thus allowing them to make informed decisions when making health care decisions. I will also push to increase the annual contribution limits to Health Savings and Flexible Spending Accounts, as no American should be exposed to financial ruin due to medical costs. Minimum policy requirements should be eliminated as individuals should determine their own coverage, not federal bureaucrats.
The sovereignty of any nation requires secure borders. The most essential purpose of government is to protect its citizens from foreign invasion and to provide for the common good of the people here legally. The United States does not currently have an immigration “system” in any true sense of the term, but rather a jumbled mess of arcane rules and regulations made via backroom deals that serve only the wealthy crony class, career politicians, and unelected special interests. These groups created the current “framework” that undercuts the interests of ordinary middle and working class Americans made up of every race, creed, and religion. This existing “framework” cannot be easily repaired and must be discarded, and any new immigration system must subsequently adhere to the following principles:
1. Eliminate illegal immigration entirely.
2. Reduce legal immigration to a level that does not depress wages for American workers.
3. End chain migration and replace it with a merit based system that does not greatly expand the
total U.S. population.
4. Prioritize US citizens in educational institutions and the workplace.
5. There will be no consideration of any amnesty for ANY illegal immigrants until complete border
security has been achieved (backed up by reliable data).
Ultimately, any reforms that are passed must be enforced, meaning that there must be “teeth” in legislation in order to prevent rogue judges and federal, state, and local governments from ignoring federal laws. This also means that interior enforcement of immigration laws must be greatly expanded, thereby eliminating the current farcical policy of allowing anyone who escapes border patrol detection and gets past the current 50 mile “buffer” zone of the Mexico/Canadian borders to remain without penalty.
In an age of global terror, drug cartels, and criminal gangs, the ultimate goal must be to have ZERO illegal immigrants residing in the United States. Similarly, the level and type of legal immigrants welcomed into the country must be based on what is actually needed for the benefit of the average American citizen, factoring in the cause and effect of immigrants on wages, access to education and other social services, affordability and access to housing and health care, impact on the environment, and the overall influence on American traditions and culture.
An effective and efficient immigration system that prioritizes the interests of its own citizens requires the following policy prescriptions:
1. Pass the Social Security Card Modernization Act.
2. Mandate that all illegal entry, overstaying visas, or falsifying U.S. citizenship or legal residency is a criminal offense.
3. Enforce ALL existing immigration laws.
4. Pass new immigration and asylum Laws.
5. Expedite asylum cases.
6. Tax remittances to fund border security and interior enforcement.
7. Fund the border wall, detention facilities, and hiring of immigration officials.
8. End birthright citizenship.
Who gave money to this candidate?
Contributions
Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:
More information about contributions
By State:
By Size:
By Type:
Political Beliefs
Political Philosophy
Fidelity to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and protecting our civil liberties is of paramount importance as they continue to be eroded. The role of any federal government is to promote the welfare of its own citizens, not foreign nationals. The sovereignty of the individual is the foundation of the American experience and government should be limited. Individuals should be empowered to make their own decisions. This includes lower taxation and deciding how to spend their own money, raise their children, and purchase health insurance. I trust the American people to know what is best for themselves and will work to expand liberty.