Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday June 7, 2022 — California Primary Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Judicial

Los Angeles County Superior CourtCandidate for Judge, Seat 67

Photo of Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes

Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes

Deputy Public Defender, County of Los Angeles
477,815 votes (37.2%)Winning
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My Choices'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has provided information.
Thank candidate for sharing their information on Voter's Edge.

My Top 3 Priorities

  • Improve public safety by addressing the root causes of crime
  • Lift up the voices of the people closest to the problem and to break the cycle of violence
  • Invest in programs and plans to prevent crime and re-integrate offenders back into their communities

Experience

Experience

Profession:Deputy Public Defender-Attorney, LA County
Deputy Public Defender, County of Los Angeles, Public Defender's Office (2002–current)
Deputy Public Defender, Office of the Los Angeles County Public Defender — Appointed position (2002–current)

Education

Case Western Reserve University Juris Doctor (J.D.), Law (2002)
Syracuse University Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), African American Studies, Sociology (1998)

Community Activities

Member, Public Defender Local Union 148 (2020–current)
Board Member, National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) (2020–current)
Vestry Governing Board Member, All Saints Church (2020–current)
Member, California Public Defenders Association (2004–current)
Member, Pathways to Volunteering, Community Service Organization (2016–current)

Biography

Elizabeth was raised in a diverse suburb of Cleveland, Ohio in a family that believed firmly that all human beings are created equally.  At a young age she quickly recognized that injustice and inequality are unacceptable and that it was her duty to be a part of the solution.  She attended Syracuse University and Case Western Reserve University School of Law and the day after graduation in 2002 she and her husband drove a van to Los Angeles where she began working for Los Angeles County Office of Public Defender.  During the summer of law school, she had the honor of serving as a Law Clerk in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in New York and then as a Legal Intern at the Human Rights Watch in New York City.  

Elizabeth and her husband are both public school educated and current union members, and their two children attend local public schools.  Being in a multi-racial family with a child who identifies at LGBTQ has given her the unique perspective of the challenges that marginalized people face while comparing that to the privileges and opportunities she inherently has. 

In the Public Defender’s office, she has tried many cases of all levels and complexities, worked as a juvenile resource attorney advocating for children with special needs, and currently litigates claims of racial injustice as part of the Racial Justice Unit.  Elizabeth has also co-founded and is the President of the Women Defender Association. 

Elizabeth’s leadership and community service is long-standing and broad based.  If anyone needs a hand and asks her to assist it is hard for her to say no.  She creates small local service projects such as a hot lunch program for Learning Works Charter school during the pandemic and organizing hundreds of holiday gifts for unaccompanied minors in Southern California.  She serves on the governing board of her inclusive church, various board positions at her children’s schools, and she is on the Defender Council of National Legal Aid & Defenders Association.  Her family often makes hygiene packs for unhoused neighbors, cooks extra turkeys during the holiday and makes Easter baskets for foster children.  Elizabeth wants to instill in her children that they are part of the human family and as such it is their duty to give back. 

Elizabeth is driven by the deep desire to leave the world a better place.  She has seen the injustice of the legal system first-hand and wants to work to bring equality, dignity and compassion to the judicial bench. 

Who supports this candidate?

Featured Endorsements

  • Los Angeles County Democratic Party
  • Judy Chu, U.S. Congresswoman, California’s 27th Congressional District
  • Stonewall Democratic Club

Organizations (41)

  • The Democratic Party of The San Fernando Valley
  • West LA Democratic Club
  • National Women’s Political Caucus
  • Working Families Party
  • UNITE HERE UNION, Local 11
  • New Frontier Democratic Club
  • Korean American Democratic Committee
  • Santa Clarita Valley Democrats
  • Los Angeles Watts Times Newspaper
  • Culver City Democratic Club
  • Los Angeles Sentinel Newspaper
  • International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 192
  • MLK Democratic Club
  • Southern California Armenian Democrats
  • Santa Monica Democratic Club
  • Progressive Asian Network For Action
  • Sunrise Movement LA
  • California Federation of Interpreters, Local 39000
  • Arroyo Democratic Club
  • ACT Pasadena
  • LA Progressive
  • Action Cali
  • San Gabriel Valley Progressives
  • La Defensa
  • Glendale Democratic Club
  • North Valley Democratic Club of Los Angeles
  • Public Defender’s Union, Local 148
  • Black Los Angeles Young Democrats
  • Progressive Democrats of the Santa Monica Mountains
  • The Future Left
  • Democrats of the Pasadena Foothills
  • Foothill Community Democrats
  • Center For Biological Diversity
  • People's Action
  • Democratic Alliance for Action of Santa Clarita
  • Ground Game LA
  • Roofers and Waterproofers Union, Local 36
  • HHH Democratic Club
  • Yes We Can Democratic Club
  • Americans For Democratic Action
  • Democrats for Neighborhood Action

Elected Officials (23)

  • U.S. Congresswoman Judy Chu, 27th District
  • Senator Anthony Portantino, CA State Senate, 25th District
  • Senator Maria Elena Durazo, CA State Senate, 24th District
  • Ash Kalra, California Assemblymember, District 27
  • Isaac Bryan, California Assemblymember, District 54
  • Daniel Lee, Culver City Mayor
  • Ardashes Kassakhian, Mayor of Glendale
  • Honorable Craig Richman, Superior Court Judge
  • Honorable Gustavo Sztraicher, Superior Court Judge
  • Lindsey Horvath, West Hollywood Mayor
  • Honorable Enrique Monguia, Superior Court Judge
  • Honorable Ronald Owen Kaye, Superior Court Judge
  • Honorable Norman Shapiro, Superior Court Judge
  • Al Austin Long Beach City Councilmember
  • Mike Bonin Los Angeles City Councilmember
  • Yasmine-Imani McMorrin Culver City Councilmember
  • Sasha Perez, Alhambra City Councilmember
  • Scarlet Paralta, Montebello City Councilmember
  • Frank Aurelio Yokoyama, City of Cerritos Councilmember
  • Ali Sajjad Taj, City of Artesia Councilmember
  • Dr. Armond Aghakhanian, Burbank Unified School Board of Education
  • Ana Valencia, Norwalk Vice Mayor
  • Konstantine Anthony, Burbank Vice Mayor

Individuals (12)

  • Victor Narro, UCLA Law School faculty member and expert on immigrant rights and labor issues.
  • Luis Rodriguez, Community and Urban Peace Activist, Poet, and Journalist
  • Darrell Goode, NAACP Area Director (for identification purposes only)
  • Ricardo D. Garcia, Los Angeles Public Defender (for identification purposes only)
  • Susan Burton, activist who works with formerly incarcerated people and founded the nonprofit organization, A New Way of
  • Adriana Cabrera, CA Democratic Assembly Delegate, 59th District
  • Jason Lyon, Pasadena Planning Commissioner
  • Josh Nuni, California Democratic Party Executive Board Member Assembly District 52
  • Amy Brenneman, Actress, Writer, and Producer
  • Morgan Walsh, Gender Nation Co-founder, Actor, Writer
  • L. David Patterson, Mayor Pro tem of Hawthorne
  • Eunisses Hernandez, Executive Director of La Defensa, a grassroots activist organization supporting criminal justice ref

Questions & Answers

Questions from League of Women Voters of LA County (2)

Do you believe that all citizens have adequate access to legal help and the legal system? If not, what can be done to provide wider and better access?
Answer from Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes:

 

I believe in a legal system where every citizen has equal access, rights and treatment under the law.  Unfortunately, in our current legal system, that is not always the case.  

More often than not people suspected of crime are put in jail upon arrest pending a trial. Many times, they remain in custody while waiting for their trial even though the laws are changing in favor of a no cash bail system.  Pre-trial release should be based not on one's income but on potential dangerousness to the community and likelihood of return to court.  

Although Los Angeles County has one of the best public defender systems in America, the caseload that we carry as public defenders is overwhelming and the court system is overwhelmed. The pandemic has made the legal system even more backlogged than usual and many resources are being stretched thin. Alternative courts are not being adequately funded and a wait for a bed in a treatment program can be very long.  Alternatively, someone with financial means may be able to pay for a program or have it funded by insurance.  There are more remote areas of Los Angeles County where access to courts can be difficult for people with less financial means.  Finally, for people for whom English is not their first language, adequate access to the legal system and understanding the court process is a challenge.  There are many ways in which citizens do not have adequate and equal access to the legal system or help navigating it.  If I were elected I would do my absolute best to improve this and make sure that all people in my court felt as though the legal system is accessible to them. 

 

What do you perceive as the greatest obstacles to justice, if any?
Answer from Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes:

The greatest obstacles to justice are 1) an overreliance on incarceration as the only method in reducing crime, recidivism and keeping our communities safe; 2) racial and economic injustice, 3) Centering the wants, needs and concerns of victims of crimes rather that either excluding them from the process or not valuing their wishes and concerns. I am committed to changing the narrative about race in American as it related to criminal justice. In our present justice system wealth, not guilt, too often shapes outcomes. I have also seen that over-incarceration does not in and of itself reduce crime in the long run. Using prisons to deal with poverty and mental illness only serves makes these problems worse. People le overcrowded and violent jails and prisons more traumatized, mentally ill, and addicted than they entered.

In my current role of public defender, I see obstacles every day. After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and unintended consequences for individuals, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system. I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. Much of my approach is based on ensuring justice is fair and equitable to all people in our community. 

Alternatives to incarceration can repair harms suffered by victims, provide benefits to the community, treat the drug-addicted or mentally ill, and rehabilitate offenders. Aside from the societal benefits that come with embracing alternatives to incarceration, decarceration also benefits communities financially. The Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that $80 billion a year is spent on incarceration in the United States, a number many have deemed an underestimate. Alternatives to incarceration can also prevent additional crimes in the future by keeping offenders out of the “prison culture.” U.S. jail and prison systems see extremely high rates of inmates with substance use and mental health disorders. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, “85% of the prison population has an active substance use disorder or were incarcerated for a crime involving drugs.

Before we can maximize the benefits of alternatives to incarceration, however, we must give courts the full power to use cost-effective, recidivism-reducing sentencing options instead. Prison or jail time separates the offender from his or her spouse and children, sometimes for decades at a time. Alternatives to incarceration keep people with their families, in their neighborhoods and jobs, and allow them to earn money, pay taxes, and contribute to their communities. I know for sure that all people in the legal system are not being treated with respect and be treated equally under the law. My personal, guiding principle, grounded in my experience and faith is to do everything I can to ameliorate that situation.

Political Beliefs

Political Philosophy

Elizabeth has been a lifelong advocate for the less fortunate in our society.  She has dedicated her professional and personal life to marginalized people in underserved communities. Her political philosophy has emerged from that background and is highly consistent with the California Democratic Party.  While Elizabeth’s political philosophy includes protecting our environment, advocating for universal health care, reducing income inequality, the right of a woman to choose her own future, the right to death with dignity, the right to equal access for those with disabilities. et. al., these things are not particularly relevant to the position she is seeking.

Elizabeth is committed to public safety first and foremost, while supporting a criminal justice system that provides fair and equitable treatment for all.  Crime prevention and rehabilitation must focus on proven, evidence-based programs and investment in proven alternatives to incarceration. She is committed to eliminating racial and economic disparities within the criminal justice system and to ending the failed system of mass incarceration in California prisons and jails.

 After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and poor outcomes for neighborhoods of color, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system. Los Angeles is the epicenter of mass incarceration in the United States, and that has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color. Elizabeth is advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions.

Elizabeth’s 20 years as a public defender has given her a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses in our criminal justice system and has a strong conviction that unnecessary confinement has been ineffective in reducing public safety in Los Angeles County and elsewhere.  Some people believe that public defenders will be soft on crime as a judge.  The reality is public defenders are hard on justice, knowing that the majority of the people that come through the criminal justice system are struggling to overcome barriers in life such as addiction, mental health challenges, homelessness, poverty, or joblessness.  Rather than invest in programs that seeks to redress these issues we too often choose to simply warehouse them at a great cost to the individual and our community. The larger society benefits, and we all would be safer if the true root causes of crime are addressed instead of the symptoms. In essence she opposes using prisons and jails as de facto mental health facilities and she will fight to adequately fund community mental health and substance abuse programs;

Criminal justice reform must incorporate every aspect of the criminal justice system, including what we choose to criminalize, the practices and behavior of law enforcement professionals, charging, sentencing, and bail, treatment of those incarcerated, diversion and rehabilitation, and reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals into society. Elizabeth believes strongly in fairness for the accused and rehabilitation of offenders is critical to reforming the system. She supports the implementation of restorative justice practices within law enforcement agencies and schools that brings together those who have committed crimes with victims and community members in an effort to recognize and repair the damage caused by criminal activity through accountability and rehabilitation. She also supports effective, quality drug treatment programs that are easily accessible for every person with an alcohol or substance abuse disorder.

Elizabeth’s political philosophy is focused on protecting the public by addressing the origins of crime. She supports investment in proven strategies to prevent crime, including providing structured preschool and afterschool programs for youth, as well as programs and policies to promote school retention and graduation to effectively end the school-to-prison pipeline. She also supports implementing community policing strategies where the officers and the community work together as partners.  Elizabeth is a supporter of victim-witness advocacy that provides therapeutic assistance, financial compensation, and support for comprehensive services for victims of crime.

Elizabeth supports fair and just laws and equitable enforcement that opposes criminalization of persons who commit low-level offenses due to homelessness or mental illness by directing them to public health and housing services, rather than resorting to arrest. She also supports equal enforcement of laws and policies that protect both women and men from sexual assault and rape.

Regarding juvenile justice, Elizabeth opposes youths being held in adult prisons and jails and the practice of trying juveniles as adults, supports youth parole by providing review for all sentences committed before the age of 23, including sentences of Life, Life Without the Possibility of Parole, and determinate sentences. She supports increased oversight of juvenile justice agencies and implementation of trauma-responsive justice systems grounded in adolescent development to yield better outcomes for youth and reduce racial and socioeconomic inequalities.

Elizabeth will fight to defend and promote the rights, opportunities, and safety of all people of Los Angeles County, especially the most vulnerable.  She envisions a county that leads the world as a model criminal justice reform rooted in fairness and justice in all our diverse communities; one in which the minority, the poor and the disadvantaged get the same treatment as the wealthy, the privileged, the powerful, and the politically connected. She is intimately familiar with effective alternatives to incarceration and programs to re-integrate people back into their communities that truly improve public safety.  She wants to help ensure that all voices are heard and reform movement changemakers have the tools and resources needed to succeed.

Having judges with diverse qualifications and experiences like Elizabeth’s will introduce new perspectives changing the perception of the court and giving people an assurance that their voices are heard in the system. If she were elected, she would treat everyone equally, with dignity and compassion. Elizabeth’s political philosophy defends and promotes the values that support all people’s hopes and dreams for a vibrant future, founded in an affirmative understanding of the intersectional nature of social and economic equity.

 

Position Papers

Re-Imagining Criminal Justice in LA County

Summary

I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. Much of my approach is based on ensuring justice is blind to a person’s ethnicity, income-level, religion or skin tone.

 

Introduction

Ninety-four percent of Americans feel there is a need for change in our criminal justice system. I am one of those, and I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and unintended consequences for individuals, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system.

The foundation of my platform is supported by three pillars: Public Safety, Restorative Justice, and Robust Re-Entry Programs to make Los Angeles County the leader in criminal justice reform. For some, the law requires, or the crime dictates, incarceration. However, after practicing almost every day in court for nearly twenty years and handling hundreds if not thousands of cases, I have come to know that the majority of the people that come through the criminal justice system are struggling to overcome barriers in life such as addiction, mental health challenges, homelessness, poverty, or joblessness.  Rather than invest in programs that seeks to redress these issues we too often choose to simply warehouse them at a great cost to the individual and our community. The larger society benefits, and we all would be safer if the true root causes of crime are addressed instead of the symptoms.

Public Safety

We need to keep our neighborhoods safe. To do that, we need to re-invent the steps we take to achieve safer communities. The old model has produced mass incarceration and fractured neighborhoods but has not reduced crime. We need new solutions to address the underlying problems that produce crimes, and a new approach to correcting these challenges.  We need a justice system that has different responses for different situations—shifting gears to treatment, prevention, and long-term public safety solutions as appropriate. If we focus more on addiction, mental health, job assistance and housing support, our communities would be safer. By taking a practical approach to criminal justice reform, we can decrease crime, safely reduce incarceration, enhance public safety, and make more responsible use of our resources.

Restorative Justice

The goal of restorative justice is a victim-centered approach where there is true healing and wholeness for the harmed party or community. We need to lift up the voices of the people closest to the problem and to break the cycle of violence afflicting our neighborhoods. Criminal justice reform is only possible when everyone — incarcerated people, victims, families, communities, law enforcement, and prosecutors — is invited to the table. We want to help ensure that all voices are heard and reform movement changemakers have the tools and resources needed to succeed. We can do this by bringing community members to the courtrooms to help fashion a system that restores true justice and peace by addressing what needs to be done for everyone’s healing, wholeness, forgiveness, and redemption.

Robust Re-Entry Programs

Today people leave overcrowded and violent jails and prisons often more traumatized, mentally ill, and worse off than when they entered. We must identify and break through the systemic barriers that keep so many people from achieving their full potential. After rehabilitation or incarceration, we must invest in programs and plans to re-integrate people back into their communities in a way that supports mental health, housing, job coaching, training, and placement. Investing in people transitioning out of programs and incarceration is also investing in our own communities. We can learn from the success of innovative programs in our country and from other countries about successful ways to re-integrate formerly incarcerated people into communities increasing the likelihood of their success, protecting the safety of the community, and reducing recidivism.

Summary

We are at an inflection point in the evolution of criminal justice in our country. We know we cannot solve today’s problems with yesterday’s approaches. We need an effective system that protects people and preserves public safety while respecting human dignity and ensuring equal justice for all under the law. There is much work to be done, and that work requires more judges who are introspective and audacious leaders, willing to take on the very promises of our democracy.

 Diverse legal backgrounds matter for our judiciary. For far too long, LA County courts have been dominated by those whose principal legal experiences have involved prosecuting offenders. In many cases they have perpetuated a system that too often failed uphold the fundamental rights of both victims and the accused and too often failed to make us safe. Having judges with diverse qualifications and experiences will introduce new perspectives changing the perception of the court and giving people an assurance that their voices are heard in the system. If I am elected, I know that as a judge I would treat everyone equally, with dignity and compassion, ensuring the voiceless and disadvantaged are given the same benefits as the wealthy and powerful.

 

 

 

xxx

Summary

 

 

xxx

xxx

Videos (2)

— April 22, 2022 Defenders of Justice

This is a chance to see Eliizabeth Lashley-Haynes in person and to see her in action.  She describes her personal life, her work experience and her platform for reimagining criminal justice.

— June 1, 2022 A PROJECT OF TIDES ADVOCACY 501(C)4

The Defenders of Justice Slate, including Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION