2022 Judicial Elections Candidate Ratings
Discussion of candidates for 9 Superior Court seats
Get the facts on the California candidates running for election to the Judge, Seat 67 — Los Angeles County Superior Court
Find out their top 3 priorities, their experience, and who supports them.
2022 Judicial Elections Candidate Ratings
Discussion of candidates for 9 Superior Court seats
Elizabeth was raised in a diverse suburb of Cleveland, Ohio in a family that believed firmly that all human beings are created equally. At a young age she quickly recognized that injustice and inequality are unacceptable and that it was her duty to be a part of the solution. She attended Syracuse University and Case Western Reserve University School of Law and the day after graduation in 2002 she and her husband drove a van to Los Angeles where she began working for Los Angeles County Office of Public Defender. During the summer of law school, she had the honor of serving as a Law Clerk in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal in New York and then as a Legal Intern at the Human Rights Watch in New York City.
Elizabeth and her husband are both public school educated and current union members, and their two children attend local public schools. Being in a multi-racial family with a child who identifies at LGBTQ has given her the unique perspective of the challenges that marginalized people face while comparing that to the privileges and opportunities she inherently has.
In the Public Defender’s office, she has tried many cases of all levels and complexities, worked as a juvenile resource attorney advocating for children with special needs, and currently litigates claims of racial injustice as part of the Racial Justice Unit. Elizabeth has also co-founded and is the President of the Women Defender Association.
Elizabeth’s leadership and community service is long-standing and broad based. If anyone needs a hand and asks her to assist it is hard for her to say no. She creates small local service projects such as a hot lunch program for Learning Works Charter school during the pandemic and organizing hundreds of holiday gifts for unaccompanied minors in Southern California. She serves on the governing board of her inclusive church, various board positions at her children’s schools, and she is on the Defender Council of National Legal Aid & Defenders Association. Her family often makes hygiene packs for unhoused neighbors, cooks extra turkeys during the holiday and makes Easter baskets for foster children. Elizabeth wants to instill in her children that they are part of the human family and as such it is their duty to give back.
Elizabeth is driven by the deep desire to leave the world a better place. She has seen the injustice of the legal system first-hand and wants to work to bring equality, dignity and compassion to the judicial bench.
I believe in a legal system where every citizen has equal access, rights and treatment under the law. Unfortunately, in our current legal system, that is not always the case.
More often than not people suspected of crime are put in jail upon arrest pending a trial. Many times, they remain in custody while waiting for their trial even though the laws are changing in favor of a no cash bail system. Pre-trial release should be based not on one's income but on potential dangerousness to the community and likelihood of return to court.
Although Los Angeles County has one of the best public defender systems in America, the caseload that we carry as public defenders is overwhelming and the court system is overwhelmed. The pandemic has made the legal system even more backlogged than usual and many resources are being stretched thin. Alternative courts are not being adequately funded and a wait for a bed in a treatment program can be very long. Alternatively, someone with financial means may be able to pay for a program or have it funded by insurance. There are more remote areas of Los Angeles County where access to courts can be difficult for people with less financial means. Finally, for people for whom English is not their first language, adequate access to the legal system and understanding the court process is a challenge. There are many ways in which citizens do not have adequate and equal access to the legal system or help navigating it. If I were elected I would do my absolute best to improve this and make sure that all people in my court felt as though the legal system is accessible to them.
The greatest obstacles to justice are 1) an overreliance on incarceration as the only method in reducing crime, recidivism and keeping our communities safe; 2) racial and economic injustice, 3) Centering the wants, needs and concerns of victims of crimes rather that either excluding them from the process or not valuing their wishes and concerns. I am committed to changing the narrative about race in American as it related to criminal justice. In our present justice system wealth, not guilt, too often shapes outcomes. I have also seen that over-incarceration does not in and of itself reduce crime in the long run. Using prisons to deal with poverty and mental illness only serves makes these problems worse. People le overcrowded and violent jails and prisons more traumatized, mentally ill, and addicted than they entered.
In my current role of public defender, I see obstacles every day. After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and unintended consequences for individuals, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system. I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. Much of my approach is based on ensuring justice is fair and equitable to all people in our community.
Alternatives to incarceration can repair harms suffered by victims, provide benefits to the community, treat the drug-addicted or mentally ill, and rehabilitate offenders. Aside from the societal benefits that come with embracing alternatives to incarceration, decarceration also benefits communities financially. The Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that $80 billion a year is spent on incarceration in the United States, a number many have deemed an underestimate. Alternatives to incarceration can also prevent additional crimes in the future by keeping offenders out of the “prison culture.” U.S. jail and prison systems see extremely high rates of inmates with substance use and mental health disorders. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, “85% of the prison population has an active substance use disorder or were incarcerated for a crime involving drugs.
Before we can maximize the benefits of alternatives to incarceration, however, we must give courts the full power to use cost-effective, recidivism-reducing sentencing options instead. Prison or jail time separates the offender from his or her spouse and children, sometimes for decades at a time. Alternatives to incarceration keep people with their families, in their neighborhoods and jobs, and allow them to earn money, pay taxes, and contribute to their communities. I know for sure that all people in the legal system are not being treated with respect and be treated equally under the law. My personal, guiding principle, grounded in my experience and faith is to do everything I can to ameliorate that situation.
Elizabeth has been a lifelong advocate for the less fortunate in our society. She has dedicated her professional and personal life to marginalized people in underserved communities. Her political philosophy has emerged from that background and is highly consistent with the California Democratic Party. While Elizabeth’s political philosophy includes protecting our environment, advocating for universal health care, reducing income inequality, the right of a woman to choose her own future, the right to death with dignity, the right to equal access for those with disabilities. et. al., these things are not particularly relevant to the position she is seeking.
Elizabeth is committed to public safety first and foremost, while supporting a criminal justice system that provides fair and equitable treatment for all. Crime prevention and rehabilitation must focus on proven, evidence-based programs and investment in proven alternatives to incarceration. She is committed to eliminating racial and economic disparities within the criminal justice system and to ending the failed system of mass incarceration in California prisons and jails.
After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and poor outcomes for neighborhoods of color, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system. Los Angeles is the epicenter of mass incarceration in the United States, and that has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color. Elizabeth is advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions.
Elizabeth’s 20 years as a public defender has given her a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses in our criminal justice system and has a strong conviction that unnecessary confinement has been ineffective in reducing public safety in Los Angeles County and elsewhere. Some people believe that public defenders will be soft on crime as a judge. The reality is public defenders are hard on justice, knowing that the majority of the people that come through the criminal justice system are struggling to overcome barriers in life such as addiction, mental health challenges, homelessness, poverty, or joblessness. Rather than invest in programs that seeks to redress these issues we too often choose to simply warehouse them at a great cost to the individual and our community. The larger society benefits, and we all would be safer if the true root causes of crime are addressed instead of the symptoms. In essence she opposes using prisons and jails as de facto mental health facilities and she will fight to adequately fund community mental health and substance abuse programs;
Criminal justice reform must incorporate every aspect of the criminal justice system, including what we choose to criminalize, the practices and behavior of law enforcement professionals, charging, sentencing, and bail, treatment of those incarcerated, diversion and rehabilitation, and reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals into society. Elizabeth believes strongly in fairness for the accused and rehabilitation of offenders is critical to reforming the system. She supports the implementation of restorative justice practices within law enforcement agencies and schools that brings together those who have committed crimes with victims and community members in an effort to recognize and repair the damage caused by criminal activity through accountability and rehabilitation. She also supports effective, quality drug treatment programs that are easily accessible for every person with an alcohol or substance abuse disorder.
Elizabeth’s political philosophy is focused on protecting the public by addressing the origins of crime. She supports investment in proven strategies to prevent crime, including providing structured preschool and afterschool programs for youth, as well as programs and policies to promote school retention and graduation to effectively end the school-to-prison pipeline. She also supports implementing community policing strategies where the officers and the community work together as partners. Elizabeth is a supporter of victim-witness advocacy that provides therapeutic assistance, financial compensation, and support for comprehensive services for victims of crime.
Elizabeth supports fair and just laws and equitable enforcement that opposes criminalization of persons who commit low-level offenses due to homelessness or mental illness by directing them to public health and housing services, rather than resorting to arrest. She also supports equal enforcement of laws and policies that protect both women and men from sexual assault and rape.
Regarding juvenile justice, Elizabeth opposes youths being held in adult prisons and jails and the practice of trying juveniles as adults, supports youth parole by providing review for all sentences committed before the age of 23, including sentences of Life, Life Without the Possibility of Parole, and determinate sentences. She supports increased oversight of juvenile justice agencies and implementation of trauma-responsive justice systems grounded in adolescent development to yield better outcomes for youth and reduce racial and socioeconomic inequalities.
Elizabeth will fight to defend and promote the rights, opportunities, and safety of all people of Los Angeles County, especially the most vulnerable. She envisions a county that leads the world as a model criminal justice reform rooted in fairness and justice in all our diverse communities; one in which the minority, the poor and the disadvantaged get the same treatment as the wealthy, the privileged, the powerful, and the politically connected. She is intimately familiar with effective alternatives to incarceration and programs to re-integrate people back into their communities that truly improve public safety. She wants to help ensure that all voices are heard and reform movement changemakers have the tools and resources needed to succeed.
Having judges with diverse qualifications and experiences like Elizabeth’s will introduce new perspectives changing the perception of the court and giving people an assurance that their voices are heard in the system. If she were elected, she would treat everyone equally, with dignity and compassion. Elizabeth’s political philosophy defends and promotes the values that support all people’s hopes and dreams for a vibrant future, founded in an affirmative understanding of the intersectional nature of social and economic equity.
I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. Much of my approach is based on ensuring justice is blind to a person’s ethnicity, income-level, religion or skin tone.
Introduction
Ninety-four percent of Americans feel there is a need for change in our criminal justice system. I am one of those, and I am advocating a common sense, practical approach to criminal justice reform that is driven by re-imagining public safety and making fiscally smart decisions. After years of policies informed by tough-on-crime rhetoric that resulted in skyrocketing levels of incarceration and unintended consequences for individuals, families, and communities, the country has an urgent need to better orient the justice system.
The foundation of my platform is supported by three pillars: Public Safety, Restorative Justice, and Robust Re-Entry Programs to make Los Angeles County the leader in criminal justice reform. For some, the law requires, or the crime dictates, incarceration. However, after practicing almost every day in court for nearly twenty years and handling hundreds if not thousands of cases, I have come to know that the majority of the people that come through the criminal justice system are struggling to overcome barriers in life such as addiction, mental health challenges, homelessness, poverty, or joblessness. Rather than invest in programs that seeks to redress these issues we too often choose to simply warehouse them at a great cost to the individual and our community. The larger society benefits, and we all would be safer if the true root causes of crime are addressed instead of the symptoms.
Public Safety
We need to keep our neighborhoods safe. To do that, we need to re-invent the steps we take to achieve safer communities. The old model has produced mass incarceration and fractured neighborhoods but has not reduced crime. We need new solutions to address the underlying problems that produce crimes, and a new approach to correcting these challenges. We need a justice system that has different responses for different situations—shifting gears to treatment, prevention, and long-term public safety solutions as appropriate. If we focus more on addiction, mental health, job assistance and housing support, our communities would be safer. By taking a practical approach to criminal justice reform, we can decrease crime, safely reduce incarceration, enhance public safety, and make more responsible use of our resources.
Restorative Justice
The goal of restorative justice is a victim-centered approach where there is true healing and wholeness for the harmed party or community. We need to lift up the voices of the people closest to the problem and to break the cycle of violence afflicting our neighborhoods. Criminal justice reform is only possible when everyone — incarcerated people, victims, families, communities, law enforcement, and prosecutors — is invited to the table. We want to help ensure that all voices are heard and reform movement changemakers have the tools and resources needed to succeed. We can do this by bringing community members to the courtrooms to help fashion a system that restores true justice and peace by addressing what needs to be done for everyone’s healing, wholeness, forgiveness, and redemption.
Robust Re-Entry Programs
Today people leave overcrowded and violent jails and prisons often more traumatized, mentally ill, and worse off than when they entered. We must identify and break through the systemic barriers that keep so many people from achieving their full potential. After rehabilitation or incarceration, we must invest in programs and plans to re-integrate people back into their communities in a way that supports mental health, housing, job coaching, training, and placement. Investing in people transitioning out of programs and incarceration is also investing in our own communities. We can learn from the success of innovative programs in our country and from other countries about successful ways to re-integrate formerly incarcerated people into communities increasing the likelihood of their success, protecting the safety of the community, and reducing recidivism.
Summary
We are at an inflection point in the evolution of criminal justice in our country. We know we cannot solve today’s problems with yesterday’s approaches. We need an effective system that protects people and preserves public safety while respecting human dignity and ensuring equal justice for all under the law. There is much work to be done, and that work requires more judges who are introspective and audacious leaders, willing to take on the very promises of our democracy.
Diverse legal backgrounds matter for our judiciary. For far too long, LA County courts have been dominated by those whose principal legal experiences have involved prosecuting offenders. In many cases they have perpetuated a system that too often failed uphold the fundamental rights of both victims and the accused and too often failed to make us safe. Having judges with diverse qualifications and experiences will introduce new perspectives changing the perception of the court and giving people an assurance that their voices are heard in the system. If I am elected, I know that as a judge I would treat everyone equally, with dignity and compassion, ensuring the voiceless and disadvantaged are given the same benefits as the wealthy and powerful.
xxx
xxx
This is a chance to see Eliizabeth Lashley-Haynes in person and to see her in action. She describes her personal life, her work experience and her platform for reimagining criminal justice.
The Defenders of Justice Slate, including Elizabeth Lashley-Haynes
A career prosecutor, Fernanda Maria Barreto is currently a Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles County assigned to the Pasadena Branch in the Victim Impact Program. She has worked tirelessly for almost 16 years to protect particularly vulnerable populations and handles felony cases involving child abuse, sexual assault, domestic violence, human trafficking, and elder abuse. As a Deputy District Attorney, Fernanda Barreto has represented the people of Los Angeles in courts all over the county, which have included the San Fernando Branch, Antelope Valley Juvenile, Sylmar Juvenile, Alhambra Branch, East LA Area Court, Central Trials and the El Monte Area Court. She has tried over seventy-five cases to verdict, including complex procedural matters requiring subject matter experts, bifurcated trials, and dual juries. Throughout her legal career, Fernanda Barreto has taken great pride in helping victims of crimes become survivors of crime while also building a reputation as being a fair prosecutor, willing to find equitable resolutions to achieve justice.
The Los Angeles County Bar Association has rated Fernanda Barreto "Well Qualified" for the postion of Superior Court Judge. To be “Well Qualified,” the candidate must possess professional ability, experience, competence, integrity and temperament indicative of superior fitness to perform the judicial function with a high degree of skill and effectiveness. It is these traits that have also garnered her the endorsement of both the Los Angeles Times and the Southern California News Group. She has also been endoresed by numerous sitting Superior Court Judges, Elected Officials, and political organizations (Local 721 SEIU, the L.A. Fed, the California Latino Judges Association, the Los Angeles African American Women Political Action Committee, etc.) for judicial seat 67.
Fernanda Barreto was born and raised in Los Angeles to Mexican and Brazilian parents. As a first generation American, education was something that her immigrant parents placed a lot of value on. She attended Pomona College and holds two Bachelor of Arts degrees in Politics and Media Studies. It was in college that Fernanda discovered she wanted to become an attorney and influenced by her family history, she made it a goal to go to law school and use her degree to better the lives of the community around her. She received her Law Degree from Loyola Law School in 2005, where she was a member of the Thomas More Honor Society and the Hispanic Moot Court.
Outside of the courtroom, Fernanda Barreto has dedicated herself to help others pursue their academic dreams. While in college, she tutored students for Upward Bound at the Claremont Colleges and during law school, volunteered to speak to at-risk youth. Fernand has spent the last decade sharing her knowledge of the law as a Professor at the California School of Law where she teaches a core first year Criminal law class and upper-level Evidence and Criminal Procedure.
Fernanda Barreto is a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the Latina Lawyers Bar Association, and the Mexican American Bar Association. When she is not in the courtroom or classroom, Fernanda spends her free time with her hilarious husband, her two energetic children, and her loving parents.
I believe that a judge is there to serve the public. They do that by giving every individual before the court an opportunity to be heard. They do this by actually listening to each party before them when they speak. By reading and analyzing the materials brought before them. By researching and asking the questions necessary to make a thoughtful decision according to the law.
Court can be dauntingly complicated for those who do not have the means to hire an attorney to navigate the process. I support the expansion of legal aid services and programs to enhance access to legal representation for those going through potentially life-altering events, such as eviction proceedings or seeking temporary restraining orders, who cannot afford an attorney. The courts should expand access with respect to these areas of service, the need for which can arise in particularly dire and high-stakes moments in a person’s life.
One undeniable reality about the felony criminal court system is that many of the people who find themselves in the system as accused defendants face mental health challenges. Many of these folks have been through the criminal justice system previously and keep reentering it in a sort of revolving door, not because they are intentionally making criminal decisions, but because of their mental health concerns. The court system can better serve these defendants and protect the public by doing a better job of addressing true mental health challenges suffered by these individuals rather than giving short shrift to the issues or, in some cases, simply resolving the cases for jail or prison time. Sadly, courts still seem not to be sufficiently staffed with special courtrooms and judges to expertly handle cases impacted by mental health issues. This should be remedied – there are mental health courts in courthouses throughout the county and that program should be expanded. And, even if jail or prison time is an appropriate sentence for someone facing these challenges, those institutions need to be better funded for and equipped with services to help such offenders receive treatment so that when they are released, they are no longer a danger to themselves or others and can have a chance to lead a productive life.
The Voter's Edge California voter guide provides in-depth information about what's on your ballot. Enter your address to get a personalized list of candidates and ballot measures, including biographies, top priorities, who supports each candidate, and more. The voter guide includes descriptions of each California ballot measure and who is spending money for and against each measure. With Voter’s Edge, you have all the election information you need at your fingertips.