Summary
Proposing a revision of Article V of the State Constitution relating to the judiciary. The State Constitution authorizes the Supreme Court to adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts. This proposed constitutional revision eliminates the requirement that a general law repealing a court rule pass by a two-thirds vote of each house, thereby providing that the Legislature may repeal a rule of court by a general law approved by a majority vote of each house of the Legislature that expresses the policy behind the repeal. The court could readopt the rule in conformity with the public policy expressed by the Legislature, but if the Legislature determines that a rule has been readopted and repeals the readopted rule, this proposed revision prohibits the court from further readopting the repealed rule without the Legislature's prior approval. Under this proposed revision, a vote to repeal those rules is changed to repeal by general law enacted by a majority vote of the legislators present. This revision requires Senate confirmation of a justice of the Supreme Court before the appointee can take office. If the Senate votes not to confirm the appointment, the judicial nominating commission must reconvene and may not renominate any person whose prior appointment to fill the same vacancy was not confirmed by the Senate.
What your vote means
Yes
A YES means the Florida Senate will confirm Florida Supreme Court justice appointees and the Legislature can repeal any Supreme Court decision with a majority vote, which is 50 percent plus one. Once the Legislature votes to repeal a ruling, the Supreme Court cannot readopt the decision within three years of the ruling’s repeal.
No
A NO means Florida Supreme Court rules will stay the same, the Florida Senate will not have authority to confirm Supreme Court appointees, and the Florida Legislature will need a supermajority, or 66 percent, to repeal a Supreme Court decision.
Additional information
Funding
Yes
We're looking for more information. Have a suggestion? Email us at amendments@fcir.orgNo
| Rank | Contributor name | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACLU of Florida | $119,557 |
| 2 | ACLU OF FLORIDA, INC. | $69,757 |
| 3 | ACLU | $45,000 |
| 4 | AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE, INC. | $5,955 |
| 5 | FLORIDA ALLIANCE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES INC. | $1,000 |
The Florida Center for Investigative Reporting uses data from the Florida Division of Elections.
Last updated: 11/5/2012
News
- Associated Press Florida Amendment 5 would shift Supreme Court powers to state legislators Oct. 11, 2012
- Florida Center for Investigative Reporting Florida Among Three States Weighing Ballot Measures That Would Politicize High Courts Aug. 14, 2012
- The News Service of Florida Florida Senate proposes state supreme court ‘reform’ amid concerns about political retaliation May 10, 2011
Editorials
Yes
We're looking for more information. Have a suggestion? Email us at amendments@fcir.orgNo
- Orlando Sentinel Talbot "Sandy" D'Alemberte, former president of the American Bar Association,: 'Reforms' would threaten rights, politicize justice Sep. 21, 2012
