Voter’s Edge California
Get the facts before you vote.
Voter’s Edge California
Go to top
Brought to you by
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
November 8, 2016 — California General Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

District 76 —California State AssemblyNovember 8, 2016 —California General Election

November 8, 2016 —California General Election

California State AssemblyDistrict 76

Election Results

  • 100% of precincts reporting (304/304).

About this office

State assembly members introduce and vote on new laws, hold hearings, and draft the state budget. They are elected to two-year terms.
Access additional information about this contest in the tabs in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Who’s Running?

For this office, only the two candidates who get the most votes in the primary election advance to the general election. The two candidates may be from the same political party.
Candidates are sorted in order of election results.
95,477 votes (59.4%)Winning
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My List'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has provided information.
Thank candidate for sharing their information on Voter’s Edge.
  • Sacramento needs a Veterans advocate and I am proud to stand up for our Vets in Sacramento
  • Every California student deserves a quality education. Early childhood education is an important factor in that. We need to be more competitive in a world economy .
  • Energy. California needs to have a diverse energy portfolio. We need to focus on new technologies to create more energy jobs in California.
Profession:Current Assemblymember for the 76th District, 28 years in the Marine Corps retiring as a Colonel.
Total money raised: $205,688

Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:

California Association of Realtors
Employees of Charles T. Munger, Jr.
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)

By State:

California 89.23%
Pennsylvania 2.44%
Texas 2.00%
Virginia 1.22%
Other 5.12%

By Size:

Large contributions (99.77%)
Small contributions (0.23%)

By Type:

From organizations (85.28%)
From individuals (14.72%)
Source: MapLight analysis of data from the California Secretary of State.
Researched by Voter’s Edge
Source: San Diego County Registrar of Voters

76th District

Marine Colonel/Assemblymember

I am running for re-election because I care about continuing to improve our schools, protecting the average taxpayer, and keeping promises to our veterans.

Our children deserve a quality education that provides them with the tools and skill sets that they will need for success in the 21st century. Every child deserves a safe school with world class teachers. I will continue my fight to make certain that more dollars are spent in the classroom and not on overhead.

Before I was elected, I promised to protect Proposition 13 and never vote for a tax increase. I am proud to say that I have kept that promise. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association gave me an “A” grade when it comes to protecting taxpayers. I have also taken the lead in opposing “job killer” legislation that drives jobs out of California. We need to create a positive business environment that is capable of creating long term job growth.

As a retired Marine Colonel I understand how our region has benefited by the presence of our military and its veterans. During my time in the State Assembly I have introduced legislation that streamlined the benefit application process for veterans and another that made going to college more affordable. I am proud that the American Legion named me their “Legislator of the Year”.

If you honor me again with your vote I will continue to work to improve our schools, honor our veterans, and protect taxpayers.

65,377 votes (40.6%)
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My List'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has provided information.
Thank candidate for sharing their information on Voter’s Edge.
  • Getting Special Interest Money Out Of Politics
  • Advocating For Common Sense Solutions To State Budget Problems In Order To Reduce Taxes And Improve Services
  • Protecting The Public's Essential Natural Resources
Profession:Chief Operating Officer / Businessman / Entrepreneur / Election Reform Advocate
Executive Vice President – Portfolio Manager, RIA Representative, Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC (2007–current)
President/CEO, Konodomo Group (1999–current)
Chief Operating Officer, Image Orthodontics (2015–current)
Board Member, Californians for Electoral Reform — Elected position (2014–2016)
Chief Operating Officer, Parallax Fund, L.P. (2004–2006)
Board Member, Californians for Electoral Reform — Elected position (2003–2005)
Professor (Economics, Finance, & Accounting), Moscow University Touro [Московский университет Туро] (2004–2004)
Board Member, North County Humane Society/SPCA — Appointed position (2003–2004)
Board Member, Mayfield Community Clinic — Elected position (1992–1995)
Thomas Jefferson School of Law Contracts, Torts, & Legal Writing (2003)
University of Southern California M.B.A., Business Administration (2001)
Stanford University B.A., Economics (1990)

For 25 years, I've worked in the real world of finance, entrepreneurship, and education.  I have been a Carlsbad homeowner for 16 years, and I have served our community as a board member of the North County Humane Society/SPCA, the Mayfield Community Clinic, and Californians for Electoral Reform.

Growing up, I lived for 15 years in Half Moon Bay, a town very much like Carlsbad Village and coastal Oceanside, whose economy is dependent upon tourism, agriculture and fishing. I understand the unique communities and quality of life on California's coast.


Climate changes and the continuing drought worry many in California. What new strategies do you believe would ensure that California is able to both satisfy its water needs and protect the environment? Please be specific. 

Answer from Thomas E. Krouse:

The State of California, in conjunction with water districts throughout the state, needs to develop and implement municipal scale water recycling for agricultural purposes which will then free up fresh water supplies for residential use.

Funds should be redirected as possible away from increased storage plans which will be less or completely useless if efficient and effective water recycling infrastructure is brought online.

Water recycling is a proven technology which has already been implemented on a national scale in many countries throughout the world. The costs and reliability of water recycling are well know which will simplify the planning process and allow for transparent cost projections.

Individual water districts should take the lead in designing specific projects and then work with the State of California and the private sector on financing construction and operation of these new systems based on local supply and demand factors. The State of California should assist with funding research and technical expertise as well as providing any appropriate and effective regulatory relief or clarity to facilitate these projects.

Any attempt to spend billions of dollars building new pipelines under the Sacramento River Delta will be a complete waste of funds if not also an environmental disaster. Installing pipelines in the Delta to move water from one place to another is just like putting more straws into a single glass of water - it does not increase the supply at all, and in fact it simply drains the glass more quickly.

Water recycling actually increases the supply of water, and can be implemented around the state in quantities flexibly tailored to match local needs.


Money in Politics

Many Californians are concerned about the influence of money in politics. What can the state legislature do to ensure that decision-making by elected officials is not swayed by moneyed interests at the expense of constituents?

Answer from Thomas E. Krouse:

I support the effort to overturn Citizens United in order to remove the corrupting influence of vast amounts of special interest money on our elections and in our government. In conjunction with this position, I have been a long-term supporter of the California Clean Money Campaign, and I received a 100% rating from the California Clean Money Action Fund in 2014.

In addition to overturning Citizens United, it is imperative that campaign contribution limits be implemented at the local level throughout California. At present, many California cities (including Carlsbad and Oceanside) have no campaign contribution limits at all which creates a massive loophole for campaign finance considering that all statewide campaigns have contribution limits. Currently, local candidates can amass huge war chests of campaign funds while running for local office and then transfer the funds into committees used for statewide offices that have contribution limits. In addition to creating this loophole, a lack of local campaign contribution limits for local races has a much greater impact because grass roots and first-time local candidates are relatively limited in their abilities to raise campaign contributions. This overall landscape tilts the electoral playing field very much in favor of the large political parties and away from authentic community based self-representation.

Additional steps that can be taken to reduce the undue influence of money in politics include:

  • Greater transparency in terms of contributions received and money spent;
  • Limitations on transfer of funds between campaign committees;
  • Longer waiting periods for elected officials and staff before they can work as paid lobbyists; and
  • Increased access for candidates to broadcast free candidate statements on local cable channels.

We should also look at other states that have experimented with public funding for campaigns for local offices and/or voucher systems that allow voters to direct small contributions to campaigns in order to increase the number of viable grass roots and first-time candidates.

At the legislative level, additional transparency is required at the committee level so the public can better understand the source of the language that is included in bills and amendments.


Minimum Wage

There are a variety of proposals to raise California's minimum wage. Many of these proposals face opposition from business groups who are concerned that they would kill jobs. Do you support increasing the minimum wage in California?  In your answer please explain your position on the relationship between wages and jobs with specific reference to the situation in your district. 

Answer from Thomas E. Krouse:

As an economist, I understand and believe in the basic forces of supply and demand, and I hope that all Californians believe in them too. That said, many events over the years (including but not limited to actions taken by our state and federal governments) have interfered with the natural equilibrium in the supply and demand for labor in California, and in that context, I believe that it is a reasonable step for government to take to assess whether or not our labor market is out of equilibrium and why.

Adjusted for inflation, the current minimum wage in many areas is lower than it was in the late 1960's and millions of Californians with full time jobs still do not earn enough to exceed the poverty level and thus are ongoing recipients of state and federal economic aid. The result of this is that California employers who pay these wages are receiving a taxpayer subsidy in the form of government aid to their employees.

I believe that it may be a rational and efficient economic step to ensure that minimum wages are high enough to eliminate this corporate subsidy that currently is funded by California taxpayers.

Fiscal Priorities

What are your top three fiscal priorities, recognizing the need to balance the state’s income with its spending?

Answer from Thomas E. Krouse:

End the High Speed Rail project.

Increase the Rainy Day fund.

Live within our means.

Believe it or not, they aren’t actually “crazy” in Sacramento, it’s worse than that - they are swimming in special-interest millions, and the money will keep flowing as long as we send legislators who give their lobbyists special access and give us only lip service. Please send me to Sacramento.  I will fight to:

  • End pay-to-play government and lawmaking by special interest money;
  • Re-establish the common sense California republic that is accountable to citizens not lobbyists;
  • Create jobs with free market opportunities, and end anti-competitive Sacramento cronyism;
  • Enforce accountability on bureaucrats who fail to do their jobs; and,
  • Connect veterans to the services they earned, and punish criminality like secret waitlists.

I want to stand up for citizens in the style of progressive Republican President Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt, bring back the “Square Deal,” and unleash free enterprise in California again.

As long as we send the same retread insiders back to Sacramento to cozy up to the fat cats, we will continue to get more failure, worse schools, less economic opportunity, and more taxes.

The failed 2014 state water bond - Proposition 1


The 2014 California State Water Bond (Proposition 1) was and is a failure. What we need is water recycling, not water storage.

Remember the $7 Billion water bond that the California Legislature put on the ballot just two years ago? Not only have they not added even one gallon of extra storage with all of that money after two years, if these "new" plans are implemented, extra storage will not even be useful.

The State needs to accept the simple laws of supply and demand. Building multi-billion dollar pipes in the Sacramento Delta does not increase supply by even one drop - it's just like putting more straws into the same glass of water.

The State and local municipalities need to immediately begin work on expanding water recycling with proven technology and predictable costs just as many countries around the world have successfully done. Water recycling creates an actual increase in water supply. If residential water users cannot get over the "ick" factor of recycled water, it can all be used for agricultural purposes, and our primary freshwater supplies can then be directed to residential use.

This is not rocket science - this is common sense, something Sacramento sorely lacks. So, while Sacramento wastes billions of dollars and delivers no results while our conditions worsen, Californians across the political spectrum (taxpayers, environmentalists, consumers, farmers, fishermen, businesses, etc) are rightly disappointed.

Please join me and thousands of other North County voters in demanding common sense solutions in Sacramento by voting for me for State Assembly in District 76 to bring water recycling to the table before it's too late.

Researched by Voter’s Edge
Source: San Diego County Registrar of Voters

76th District

AGE: 48
Chief Operating Officer/Businessman/Election Reform Advocate

Voters First, Not Special Interests!

Stop - “Pay-to-Play” government and lawmaking by special interests by eliminating the corrupting influence of money on elections and in government.

Ensure - Politicians and bureaucrats be held accountable for the work they should do for you on Jobs, Education, Housing, Public Safety, Transportation, and the Environment by strongly supporting efforts to increase transparency in government like the California Disclose Act (AB700) and California Clean Money Campaign (

Stop - Special Interests’ exploitation of the “Citizens’ Initiative Loophole” to evade longstanding community development rules, only to transfer the burden of traffic and infrastructure costs onto taxpayers.

Ensure - Veterans and Seniors are connected to services they earned.

Stop - San Onofre Nuclear Power Station owners from charging ratepayers $1,635 per electric meter because of their own negligence.

Ensure - Real Public Utilities Commission reform by increasing outside oversight and transparency, ending cozy relationships between special interests and regulators, posting audits online.

Promise - To remain an independent thinker, welcoming public input, listening with diligence, and collaborating to get things done in Sacramento.

After working my way through Stanford, I earned an MBA from USC and worked in the fields of finance, healthcare, education, and technology. I moved to Carlsbad 18 years ago and have served as a community boardmember with the North County Humane Society / SPCA, Mayfield Community Clinic, and Californians for Electoral Reform (

When elected, I’ll work for you with integrity.

Contact: (760) 659-3755 

Endorsements: Veterans Party of America / California League of Conservation Voters / Citizens for North County / Eve Simmons, Environmental Champion

Thomas Krouse - 5 minute candidate statement on KOCT — November 1, 2016 Thomas Krouse For Assembly 2016 / KOCT

Thomas Krouse's 5 minute candidate statement on KOCT Oceanside Community Access Television which highlights the candidates background, community achievements, and overall policy view.

Included in the stated policies are:


1) Reduce or remove the corrupting influence of special interest money on campaigns and in government;

2) Ensure real reform at the California Public Utilities Commission and overturn the current settlement agreement between the PUC and Southern California Edison regarding the closed San Onofre Nuclear Power Station that unfairly charges every Southern California ratepayer over $1,600 per electric meter;

3) End the use of privately owned prisons; and,

4) Ensure that our promises to veterans, seniors, and children are fulfilled. 

Our North County - Thomas Krouse For Assembly 2016 — November 3, 2016 Thomas Krouse For Assembly 2016

Our North County: Let's ensure that the people have a seat at the table in the California Assembly to protect our way of life in North County San Diego.

Putting the people's interest first - not that of special interests.

Please vote for Thomas Krouse for Assembly 2016 on November 8th.

Visit the People's Campaign website at or call me at 760-659-3755.


Sate [sic] legislative races — October 23, 2016 San Diego Union-Tribune
Sacramento Report: San Diego’s Lame Legislative Races — September 23, 2016 Voice of San Diego

Additional Info

Campaign Finance Data Notification

A candidate in this race, Thomas E. Krouse, has campaign finance data that is not appearing below.
The campaign of Thomas E. Krouse has raised money during the 2016 election cycle, but that information is not appearing below. Due to the way paper and electronic filings are made available to the public, our system is currently unable to display campaign finance data for this candidate.   As of 10/22/16, Thomas Krouse has raised a total of $13,028.   Thank you and we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.