Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday June 7, 2022 — California Primary Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Special District

Jefferson Elementary School District
Measure J - 55% Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Election Results

Failing

0 votes yes (0%)

0 votes no (0%)

0 ballots counted

To improve student safety and campus security systems and fencing, repair and upgrade aging classrooms and facilities, shall Jefferson Elementary School District's measure authorizing $45,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.57¢ /$100 assessed value $3,275,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, acquiring, constructing, and repairing classrooms, facilities and equipment, roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, be adopted, with oversight, all funds benefiting local schools, and not taken by the State?

What is this proposal?

Details — Official information

Impartial analysis / Proposal

The California Constitution and Education Code authorize a school district to issue bonds for specified purposes if approved at an election by 55% of those voting on the issuance of the bonds.

The Board of Trustees of Jefferson Elementary School District ("Distrct") proposes this Measure which would authorize the District to issue bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $45 million.  The bonds will have an interest rate not exeeding the legal maximum and will be repaid within the time permitted by law.  The Tax Rate Statement printed in this pamphlet contains the District's best estimates of tax rates required to service the bond debt during the life of the bonds, which is anticipated to last until June 2051.  The District's best estimate of the average annual tax rate levy to fund this bond is $15.70 per $100,000 ($0.0157/$100) of assessed valuation.  The District estimates that the total amount repayable during the life of the bond, including principal and interest, will be approximately $95 million.

The California Constitution requires the listing of specific projects to be funded from the bond revenue and certification that the Board of Trustees has evaluated safety, class size reduction, and information technology needs in the development of that list. The Bond project List can be found in the full terxt of the Measure and includes without limitation: 

* Improving student safety and campus security systems, including security, fencing, and security cameras

* Upgrading classroom safety door locks

* Upgrading security lighting

* Upgrading fire safety and emergency communication systems

* Improving access to school facilities for students with disabilities

* Repairing and/or replacing leaking roofs, heating, lighting, air conditioning, electrical, plumbing, and lighting systems

* Repairing, renovating, and/or replacing classrooms, labs, and educational facilities for math, science, reading, writing, and technology instruction

The Measure authorizes equipment acquisition, upgrades, repairs, services, construction, and other items related to the listed projects. The Bond Project List does not imply a specific prioritization among the projects and should be reviewed for further details.

No proceeds from the bonds shall be used for teacher or administrator salaries or operating expenses.

State law requires that the District take certain steps to account for the proceeds from the bonds.  Accordingly the District will appoint an independent citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual indepdendent performance and financial audits to ensure that funds are spent only for the purposes listed in the Bond Project List and for no other purposes. 

A "yes" vote on This Measure would authorize the District to issue bonds in a principal amount not to exdeed $45 million for the purposes listed in the Bond Project List.

A "no" vote would prevent the District from issuing the bonds.

This Measure passes if 55% of those voting on the measure vote "yes." 

 

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against

Arguments FOR

The Jefferson Elementary School District is committed to enhancing the safety of our schools and further strenghtening the classroom experience for students especially in the midst of the COVID pandemic. 

With the support of the community, we have been able to successfully make improvements to our elementary schools that improved the district's ability to provide students with 21st century learning opportunities and safer environments. Although we've made gains, there still remains much for us to do collectively to ensure that our youngest students continue to have the necessary support and resources to be successful in the future.

By voting YES on Measure J, the Jefferson Elementary School District will have the opportunity to continue making needed investments to improve student safety, enhance and improve learning environments as well as provide our elementary school district with the opportunity to attract quality teachers to facilities equipped with strong COVID mitigation measures. 

Vote YES on Measure J to:

* Increase student and staff safety

* Attract and retain highly qualified staff

* Provide high-quality, safe, and healthy indoor and outdoor learning environments for current and future students

Measure J has strict and clear accountability requirements so that local funds can only be used for our local students.  Measure J requires:

* All funds raised will be controlled locally to support our elementary and middle schools and cannot be taken away by the State

* Inpendendent citzen oversight and annual audits required

* All funds spent for our local students, none for administrator salaries

Measure J will continue improving Jefferson Elementary School District schools - and we know that improving our schools makes our community a more desirable place to live, do business, and raise a family. 

For safer, more secure and healthier schools in Jefferson Elementary School District:

Vote YES on Measure J!

 

/s/ Thomas Nuris, Member, JESD Bond Citizen Oversight Committee

/s/ Victoria Magbilang, ED DC Public Library Associates

/s/ Carla Ng-Garrett, Trustee, JUHSD School Board

/s/ Noralyn Sangalang, President, Jefferson Council PTA

/s/ Olga Garcia, Secretary, SB Anthony PTA 

Arguments AGAINST

Jefferson Elementary School District's enrollment is declining with 374 fewer students in 2021 than in 2012. Yet the district wants to be "acquiring" and "constructing" classrooms for fewer students.  Why?

In 2012, voters approved $67.5 million of debt for the district to "repair deteriorating roofs" and "construct, repair classrooms". Then in 2018, voters granted another $30 million of debt to "repair/upgrade aging classrooms."

Do classrooms really need construction and extensive repairs every 6 years? (If so, why aren't repairs and maintenance included in annual budgeting?)

These loans are on top of the $13,255 that they spend per student annually (latest figure 2019-20) which also comes from your property taxes.

That's $265,100 - more than a quarter million dollars - per classroom per year (based on a class size of 20).

Clearly the district is not finished milking you: they now want $45 million plus 3+ decades of interest payments, doubling the cost.  Bond debt, like home mortgages, must be repaid - with interest of up to 12% year (legal limit!)

The state government has an estimated $31 billion surplus - some say higher - so why borrow more?

Just when families are grappling with 7.9% rise in prices, how does it make sense to raise our taxes? Why not utilize the state's massive surplus - i.e. our tax money?

Next: Are the children getting good academic results through your tax dollars?

Sadly, they are not.

* 52.21% of district children are behind grade level in English

* 62.16% of children are behind grade level in math

(Source: California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership: www.Ed-Data.org)

Just say NO to more debt!

You can be FOR teachers, FOR children, and FOR education but AGAINST decades of bonded indebtedness.

Please, vote NO on Measure J.

For information: www.SVTaxpayers.org

 

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Christopher Minoletti, President Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

Replies to Arguments FOR

Jefferson Elementary School District's enrollment is declining with 374 fewer students in 2021 than in 2012. Yet the district wants to be "acquiring" and "constructing" classrooms for fewer students.  Why?

In 2012, voters approved $67.5 million of debt for the district to "repair deteriorating roofs" and "construct, repair classrooms". Then in 2018, voters granted another $30 million of debt to "repair/upgrade aging classrooms."

Do classrooms really need construction and extensive repairs every 6 years? (If so, why aren't repairs and maintenance included in annual budgeting?)

These loans are on top of the $13,255 that they spend per student annually (latest figure 2019-20) which also comes from your property taxes.

That's $265,100 - more than a quarter million dollars - per classroom per year (based on a class size of 20).

Clearly the district is not finished milking you: they now want $45 million plus 3+ decades of interest payments, doubling the cost.  Bond debt, like home mortgages, must be repaid - with interest of up to 12% year (legal limit!)

The state government has an estimated $31 billion surplus - some say higher - so why borrow more?

Just when families are grappling with 7.9% rise in prices, how does it make sense to raise our taxes? Why not utilize the state's massive surplus - i.e. our tax money?

Next: Are the children getting good academic results through your tax dollars?

Sadly, they are not.

* 52.21% of district children are behind grade level in English

* 62.16% of children are behind grade level in math

(Source: California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership: www.Ed-Data.org)

Just say NO to more debt!

Please, vote NO on Measure J.

For information: www.SVTaxpayers.org

 

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Christopher Minoletti, President Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

Replies to Arguments AGAINST

It's a shame that rigid ideologues - living outside Jefferson Elementary School District - are misleading voters to the detriment of local students.  These naysayers have submitted similar arugments against every school measure in San Mateo County, full of mistruths and distortions. 

Voters in Jefferson Elementary School District value children and their safety! Measure J will provide safe, secure schools environments for our youngest students to learn and thrive!  Making safety upgrades, improving ventilation and providing outdoor learning and eating spaces is critical to Jefferson Elementary School District's ability to provide safe, healthy learning environments.

Vote YES on Measure J to:

* Replace broken fences - establish safe, secure boundaries around schools

* Build more student drop-off zones, reducing pedestrian accidents

* Repair windows to improve ventilation

* Provide outdoor learning and eating spaces to reduce virus transmission

Measure J has strict accountability requirements ensuring local funds are used for our students.

Measure J requires:

* All funds raised are controlled locally to support Jefferson Elementary School District facilities and cannot be taken away by the State

* Independent citizen oversight and annual audits ensure Measure J completes voter-approved projects. Promises kept.

* All funds spent for our local students, none can be used for administrator salaries

Measure J continues improving JESD school facilities - and we know that improving our schools makes our community a more desirable place to live, work, and raise a family.

Join community leaders, concerned residents and local businesses to protect students, provide safe, secure, and healthy schools.

 

/s/ Adrienne Tissier, Former San Mateo County Supervisor

/s/ Dong Tran, President, Westlake Elementary PTA

/s/ Rae Gonzalez, Council Member, City of Colma

/s/ Annette Shreve, Retired Broadmoor Resident 

/s/ Clayton Koo, President, Jefferson Elementary School District Board 

Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your choices by navigating to 'My Choices'.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION