Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday June 7, 2022 — California Primary Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Special District

Brisbane Elementary School District
Measure G - 2/3 Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Election Results

Failing

0 votes yes (0%)

0 votes no (0%)

0 ballots counted

To provide teachers/instructional aides for art, music, and reading, shall Brisbane School District measure authorizing renewal of the existing local school parcel tax, at the current rate of $131 per year, for six years, commencing July 1, 2022, exempting seniors, and increasing the District's appropriations limit in the amount of funds raised by the special tax (estimated at $450,000 annually), be adopted, with funds spent exclusively on schools within Brisbane School District and not used for other purposes?

What is this proposal?

Details — Official information

Impartial analysis / Proposal

The California Constitution and State law authorize school districts to levy qualified special taxes for specified purposes. Such a tax measure passes if two-thirds of those voting on it vote to approve the measure.

The Board of Trustees of the Brisbane School District ("District") proposes to renew a special tax on parcels in the District to support various educational purposes outlined below. If approved, an annual tax of $131.00 per parcel would be imposed for six years, starting July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2028. The District estimates the tax would raise approximately $450,000 annually.

The proposed tax applies to any unit of real property wholly or partially in the District that receives a separate property tax bill from San Mateo County tax collection officials.  Parcels otherwise exempt from such property taxes will be exempt from this proposed tax.  Any individual owning and occupying a parcel as a single-family residence may apply for an exemption to the tax if they: (1) are age 65 years or older; (2) receive Supplemental Security Income for a disability, regardless of age; or (3) receive Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, regardless of age, and have an annual income not exceeding 250% of the 2012 federal poverty guidelines. Property owners exempt from the expiring parcel tax will remain exempt without needing to reapply.

The stated purposes of the tax are to:

* fund an art and music teacher;

* fund teachers and instructional aides to support reading and core academics;

* provide additional library and instruction resources

Decisions regarding allocation of the tax proceeds for these stated purposes and among specific projects within the District will be made at the sole discretion of the Board.

The proceeds of the tax shall only be used for the stated purposes. No proceeds may be spent on administrators' salaries or benefits.

The District will provide the following accountability measures: the tax proceeds will be placed into a special account and an annual report accouting for the proceeds and the status of projects funded by the tax will be filed with the Board.

The proposed tax is not intended to jeopardize local, state, or federal funding and, if any such funding is reduced or offset because of the tax, the District may reduce the amount the tax levied as necessary to restore the funding. Also the District's appropriations limit will be increased annually if required to ensure revenue from the tax may be spent for the listed purposes. 

A "yes" vote on this Measure would impose an annual tax of $131.00 per taxable parcel on property within the District for a period of six years beginning July 1, 2022, for the purposes listed above.

A "no" vote on this Measure would not allow the parcel tax to be levied.

This Measure passes if two-thirds of those voting on the measure vote "yes." 

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against

Arguments FOR

Voters have shown support for our schools by approving a parcel tax since 1999 to fund art, music, and reading programs. The tax must be renewed this year to maintain these programs in Brisbane, Panorama, and Lipman Schools.

The Brisbane School District has a vibrant art and music program that will be cut without the parcel tax funding. Our art teacher has created a comprehensive program of hands-on art and art suties. Students model clay, paint, learn about color theory, and develop an understanding of design. In music students play instruments, build confidence in music productions, and find their creative and confident voices. These are necessary school programs that will disappear without the parcel tax.

Reading skills are vital to academic success and the parcel tax has allowed us to provide extra help to students who need it most. Rising scores on the reading portion of standardized tests demonstrate the value of our investment.

The measure that has funded our art, music, and reading programs expires on June 30, 2022. Measure G would maintain these programs by renewing the parcel tax for another six years. Without Measure G, the district will be forced to cut these programs.

Measure G would cost property owners no more than $131 per year per parcel which is the current rate. No funds would be used for administration. Seniors who occupy their own homes will be exempt from the tax upon request. Seniors who have an existing exemption will be automatically exempted from the new tax.

This measure has been put on the ballot at the urging of Support Our Schools, a group of citizens from Brisbane and Southern Hills.

We urge you to vote YES on Measure G.

 

/s/ Karen Lentz, Brisbane School Trustee

/s/ Sarah Duffy, Local Parent

/s/ Christine Oquendo, Brisbane Elementary PTO Board Member

/s/ Nancy Lacsamane, Community Volunteer

/s/ Virgina Porter, Local Parent 

Arguments AGAINST

Just when families are expecting RELIEF from the supposedly "temporary" $131/year parcel tax, Brisbane Elementary School District requests A NEW TAX OF $786 PER HOME ($131 x 6 years) on top of the current $166/year tax.

Our state has an estimated $31 billion budget surplus - some say higher.

While families grapple with a 7.9% rise in prices, how does it make sense to raise our taxes? Why not utilize the state's massive surplus - i.e., our tax money?

The district spends $19,879 per student per year (latest figure 2019-20). That's 151% of the average for elementary schools statewide.

One purpose of this new parcel tax is to "maintain ... reading instruction."

Why is the most fundamental skill we should be teaching our children - reading - apparently not a priority in the district's regular budget?

Next question: has the district earned this tax increase?

Per the California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership (www.ed-data.org):

* 36.16% of the district students are below grade level in English

* 46.12% are below in math

If you got 36.16% wrong on an English test, you would get a D grade, right? And for 46.12% wrong on a math test, an F?

Should voters and taxpayers be rewarding poor performance?  If you answered "no", then please: Vote NO on Measure G.

The $19,8790 spent per student annually equates to $314,088 per class (average class size: 15.8).

District teachers' average salary and benefits are $101,356 per shortened work year.

Yet the district wants to reward itself with more of your hard-earned money despite poor academic performance?

As parents, we know that rewarding poor behavior just reaps more poor behavior.

Urge Brisbane Elementary School District's board to give our children a proper example of being financially responsible.

Vote NO on Measure G.

You can be FOR teachers, FOR children, and FOR education but against eternal "temporary tax increases."

For more information, www.SVTaxpayers.org

 

/s/ Mark W. A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Christopher Minoletti, President Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

 

Replies to Arguments FOR

Just when families are expecting RELIEF from the supposedly "temporary" $131/year parcel tax, Brisbane Elementary School District requests A NEW TAX OF $786 PER HOME ($131 x 6 years) on top of the current $166/year tax.

Our state has an estimated $31 billion budget surplus - some say higher.

While families grapple with a 7.9% rise in prices, how does it make sense to raise our taxes? Why not utilize the state's massive surplus - i.e., our tax money?

The district spends $19,879 per student per year (latest figure 2019-20). That's 151% of the average for elementary schools statewide.

One purpose of this new parcel tax is to "maintain ... reading instruction."

Why is the most fundamental skill we should be teaching our children - reading - apparently not a priority in the district's regular budget?

Next question: has the district earned this tax increase?

Per the California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership (www.ed-data.org):

* 36.16% of the district students are below grade level in English

* 46.12% are below in math

If you got 36.16% wrong on an English test, you would get a D grade, right? And for 46.12% wrong on a math test, an F?

Should voters and taxpayers be rewarding poor performance?  If you answered "no", then please: Vote NO on Measure G.

The $19,8790 spent per student annually equates to $314,088 per class (average class size: 15.8).

District teachers' average salary and benefits are $101,356 per shortened work year.

As parents, we know that rewarding poor behavior just reaps more poor behavior.

Urge Brisbane Elementary School District's board to give our children a proper example of being financially responsible.

Vote NO on Measure G.

/s/ Mark W. A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Christopher Minoletti, President Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

 

Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your choices by navigating to 'My Choices'.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION