Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday June 7, 2022 — California Primary Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Special District

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District
Measure C - 2/3 Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Election Results

Failing

0 votes yes (0%)

0 votes no (0%)

0 ballots counted

To protect core academic programs in science, technology, engineering, reading, writing, art, music and math for elementary and middle school students, maintain accelerated math programs, keep libraries open, and retain highly-qualified teachers, shall the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's measure be adopted renewing its existing $292 annual parcel taxes, providing $3,500,000 annually for ten years, with independent oversight, annual adjustments, senior exemptions, no funds for administrator salaries, and all funds staying in local schools?

What is this proposal?

Details — Official information

Impartial analysis / Proposal

The California Constitution and State law authorize school districts to levy qualified special taxes for specified purposes.  Such a tax measure passes if two-thirds of those voting on it vote to approve the measure.

The Board of Trustees of the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District ("District") proposes to renew and increase a special tax on parcels in the District to support various educational purposes. If approved, an annual tax of $292.00 per parcel, increased annually by 3%, would be imposed for ten years starting July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2033. The District estimates the tax would raise approximately $4.5 million annually.

The proposed tax applies to any unit of real property wholly or partially in the District that receives a separate property tax bill from San Mateo County tax collection officials. Parcels otherwise exempt from such property taxes will be exempt from this proposed tax. Any individual owning and occupying such a parcel as a single-family residence may apply for an exemption to the tax if they : (1) are age 65 years or older; (2) receive Supplemental Security Income for a disability, regardless of age; or (3) receive Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, regardless of age, and have an annual income not exceeding 250% of the 2012 federal poverty guidelines. Property owners exempt from the expiring parcel tax will remain exempt without needing to reapply.

The stated purposes of the tax are to:

* Protect core academic programs in science, technology, engineering, reading, writing, art, music, and math:

* Maintain accelerated math and innovative programs;

* Attract and maintain highly qualified teachers;

* Keep school libraries open;

* Retain reading specialists and qualified conusellors;

* Prevent deep cuts to education; and

*Maintain small class sizes.

Decisions regarding allocation of the tax proceeds for these stated purposes and among specific projects within the District will be made at the sole discretion of the Board.

The proceeds of the tax shall only be used for the stated purposes. No proceeds may be spent on administrators' salaries or benefits.

The District will provide the following accountability measures: the tax proceeds will be placed into a special account; an annual report accounting for the proceeds and the status of projects or programs funded by the tax will be filed with the Board; and an independent citizens' oversight committee will oversee expenditures of the proceeds.

The proposed tax is not intended to jeopardize local, state, or federal funding and, if any such funding is reduced or offset because of the tax, the District may reduce the amount of the tax levied as necessary to restore the funding. Also, the District's appropriations limit will be increased annually if required to ensure revenue from the tax may be spent for the listed purposes.

 

A "yes" vote on this Measure would impose an annual tax of $292.00, increased annually by 3%, per taxable parcel on property within the District for a period of ten years beginning July 1, 2023 for the purposes listed above.

A "no" vote on this Measure would not allow the parcel tax to be levied.

This Measure passes if two-thirds of those voting on the measure vote "yes." 

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against

Arguments FOR

Vote YES on C to renew expiring locally controlled funding at the current rate for Belmont and Redwood Shores elementary and middle schools.

Thanks to our supportive communities, award-winning academics and high quality teachers, Belmont-Redwood Shores School District provides an excellent education to local students.

However, our per student funding remains below the state average and among the lowest in the county, impacting students in our TK-8 schools. This is why Measure C is so important.

For 18 years our TK-8 schools have benefitted from locally controlled funding that cannot be taken away by the State. The approximately $3.5 million in annual funding is used to help keep high-quality teachers in our classrooms, maintain smaller class sizes, preserve outstanding academic instruction, and support our students.

Without Measure C, our schools will have to layoff teachers and make significant cuts to academic programs, impacting students in each grade.

Voting YES on C will renew this critical source of local education funding at the current rate to maintain a well-rounded education with art and music programs, and strong core academics. 

Vote YES on C for Local TK-8 Students

* Protect core academic programs in science, technology, engineering, reading, writing, and math

* Attract and maintain highly qualified teachers

* Maintain accelerated math and innovative programs

*Keep school libraries open

Strict Fiscal Accountability:

* All funds stay in local schools - the state can't take one penny

* No money can be spent on administrators' salaries

* Independent citizens' oversight will ensure funds are spent as promised

* Seniors will continue to be eligible for an exemption

Our excellent schools improve our quality of life and make Belmont and Redwood Shores desirable places to live, protecting property values for us all.

Let's continue our tradition of supporting local schools.  Join parents, teachers, seniors, business leaders, and neighbors - Vote Yes on Measure C!

www.YesforBRSS.org

/s/ John Violet, 50-year Resident

/s/ Chandra McKeon, President, Belmont-Redwood Shores Faculty Association

/s/ Julia Mates, Mayor, City of Belmont

/s/ Jeff Gee, Councilmember, District 1, City of Redwood City

/s/ Mary Morrissey Parden, Longtime Business Owner 

Arguments AGAINST

With this latest, supposedly temporary parcel tax, the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District claims they need more money to "preserve academic excellence." 

Do they have academic excellence to preserve?

In 2018, voters approved a parcel tax of $590 ($118 x 5 years) on top of regular property tax and these existing extra burdens:

* $174/year parcel tax from 2013 ($1,740/home)

* two 2010 bonds (debt!) totaling $60 million, and

* another $48 million bond from 2014.

Now, just as homeowners are expecting well-deserved tax RELIEF as the $118 and $174/year taxes end, the district wants to burden them with a WHOPPING $2.920 TAX INCREASE! ($292 x 10 years)

(Oh! That amount isn't fixed: annual adjustments means that while families are scrambling to cover a recent 7.9% rise in prices, they'd also be covering the district's inflation cost - for a whole decade.)

Has the district earned it?

Let's check students' test scores for English proficiency.:

From 2018 to 2021, results declined: only 80.19% meet proficiency

That means 19.8% of the students do NOT meet standards.

Math proficiency also declined: only 74.65% meet standards.

(Source: California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership: www.Ed-Data.org)

If you got 75% on a test, that would be a C grade, right?

Should voters and taxpayers reward a 25% failure rate?

If you answered "no", please vote NO on Measure C.

Parents know: when we reward failure, we just get more failure!

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District spends $12,479 per child.

For an average class of 21.6 students, THAT'S $269,546 PER CLASS per year.

Teachers' average salaries are $90,181 per shortened work year plus benefits of up to $17,364.

Yet the District craves more of your hard earned money - despite declining academics!

Tell Belmont-Redwood Shores School District to be financially responsible: VOTE NO on Measure C.

You can be FOR teachers, FOR children, and FOR education but AGAINST bonded indebtedness.

For information, www.svtaxpayers.org

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Aossciation

/s./ Christopher C. Minoletti, Chair Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

 

Replies to Arguments FOR

With this latest, supposedly temporary parcel tax, the Belmont-Redwood Shores School District claims they need more money to "preserve academic excellence." 

Do they have academic excellence to preserve?

In 2018, voters approved a parcel tax of $590 ($118 x 5 years) on top of regular property tax and these existing extra burdens:

* $174/year parcel tax from 2013 ($1,740/home)

* two 2010 bonds (debt!) totaling $60 million, and

* another $48 million bond from 2014.

Now, just as homeowners are expecting well-deserved tax RELIEF as the $118 and $174/year taxes end, the district wants to burden them with a WHOPPING $2.920 TAX INCREASE! ($292 x 10 years)

(Oh! That amount isn't fixed: annual adjustments means that while families are scrambling to cover a recent 7.9% rise in prices, they'd also be covering the district's inflation cost - for a whole decade.)

Has the district earned it?

Let's check students' test scores for English proficiency.:

From 2018 to 2021, results declined: only 80.19% meet proficiency

That means 19.8% of the students do NOT meet standards.

Math proficiency also declined: only 74.65% meet standards.

(Source: California Department of Education's Education Data Partnership: www.Ed-Data.org)

If you got 75% on a test, that would be a C grade, right?

Should voters and taxpayers reward a 25% failure rate?

If you answered "no", please vote NO on Measure C.

Parents know: when we reward failure, we just get more failure!

Belmont-Redwood Shores School District spends $12,479 per child.

For an average class of 21.6 students, THAT'S $269,546 PER CLASS per year.

Teachers' average salaries are $90,181 per shortened work year plus benefits of up to $17,364.

Yet the District craves more of your hard earned money - despite declining academics!

Tell Belmont-Redwood Shores School District to be financially responsible: VOTE NO on Measure C.

You can be FOR teachers, FOR children, and FOR education but AGAINST bonded indebtedness.

For information, www.svtaxpayers.org

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Aossciation

/s./ Christopher C. Minoletti, Chair Pro Tem, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County 

Replies to Arguments AGAINST

Excellent schools are the bedrock of our community - they improve our quality of life and protect the value of our homes. Measure C renews critical school funding for core academic programs and maintains smaller class sizes to ensure that students get more individualized attention from their teachers.

The opponents of Measure C recycle the same misleading data and stock arguments against every school funding measure in the Peninsula. Here are the facts about our neighborhood schools in Belmont and Redwood Shores:

Fact: The California Department of Education dashboard (www.caschooldashboard.org) shows that our award-winning schools continue to provide high-quality education, many of which are nationally recognized for student achievement.

Fact: The opponents grossly misprepresent Measure C and existing school funding which local voters have supported since 2004. Measure C simply combines and renews local school funding, saving the District money that can be better spent to support our students.

Fact: Per student funding in Belmont-Redwood Shores School District is below the state average amond among the lowest in San Mateo County. Without Measure C, students will lose $3.5 million in annual funding - requiring teacher layoffs and cuts to academic programs.

We're proud our community has supported local schools in the past. Independent citizens' oversight reports and public audits prove that past voter-approved funds have been spent as promised. You can find the reports at https://www.brssd.org/parcel-tax-oversight-committee.

It's clear that local students receive an outstanding education and Measure C helps retain the highly qualified teachers and core academic programs our students rely on.

Join us.  Vote YES on C.

/s/ Brian Matthews, Former Belmont-Redwood Shores School District Board President

/s/ Carol Raisner, Teacher Representative, Parcel Tax Oversight Committee

/s/ Janet Pepe Davis, 45 Year Belmont/Redwood Shores Realtor

/s/ Bahram Mozayeny, Former President, Belmont Chamber of Commerce

/s/ Amy Buckmaster, CEO, Chamber San Mateo County 

Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your choices by navigating to 'My Choices'.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION