Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday November 3, 2020 — California General Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Local

City of San Mateo
Measure W - Majority Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Election Results

Passing

35,224 votes yes (74.89%)

11,808 votes no (25.11%)

51,247 ballots counted

To fund general city services such as: maintaining streets and repairing potholes; providing fire, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response; managing traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian safety measures; maintaining parks, recreation and community facilities, infrastructure, and general city services; shall an ordinance increasing the City of San Mateo's existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/motel guests to 14% to provide an estimated $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?

What is this proposal?

Details — Official information

Impartial analysis / Proposal

Shawn M. Mason, City Attorney

The City of San Mateo currently imposes a 12% tax on transient occupancy (commonly referred to as a "hotel tax").

This tax consists of a 10% general tax and a 2% special tax.

The revenue raised by a "general” tax goes into the City's general fund and may be used for any municipal governmental purpose. Municipal governmental purposes include police and fire protection, library facilities, public works, street maintenance and repair, programs for seniors, parks and recreation services, and other governmentalfunctions and services.

“Special” taxes are imposed for a specific purpose and may only be used for that purpose.

The special tax component of the city’s transient occupancy tax raises revenue to finance capital improvements within the City.

If approved by a majority of the voters, Measure W will authorize an additional two percent (2%) tax on transient occupancy to be levied within the City of San Mateo.

This additional hotel tax would be a "general tax" meaning that the revenue raised from the tax would go into the City's general fund. The revenue raised by this measure may be used for any municipal governmental purpose.

The additional 2% general tax authorized by this measure would be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner as the existing hotel tax and would bring the total hotel tax to 14% that consists of a 12% general tax and a 2% special tax.

State law authorizes the City of San Mateo to levy this additional 2% hotel tax following approval by the City Council and a majority of the voters voting in an election on thmeasure.

On July 20, 2020, the San Mateo City Council approved placing this measure on the ballot to obtain voter approval of the tax increase.

If approved by the voters at the November 3, 2020election, the additional 2% hotel tax would become operative on January 1, 2021.

A YES vote approves the measure.

A NO vote rejects the measure.

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against

Arguments FOR

To overcome the current serious recession and provide critical services to San Mateo residents, we MUST vote YES on Measure W, which only applies to hotel guests and will NOT raise taxes for residents.

We are in the midst of a major recession and although some parts of our economy like retail are hurting, other parts like thetech sector remain strong. For this reason, San Mateo residents should vote YES ON MEASURE W - the 2% increase to our Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). Many cities have a higher TOT and increasing ours will bring us in line with surrounding cities.

The economic fallout of coronavirus significantly hurt San Mateo's finances with nearly $8 million deficit this year alone. The City has already made serious budget cuts. Without new funding, we could experience terrible cuts to critical services. Voting YES ON MEASURE W helps maintain services like 911 emergency response, street maintenance, traffic management, crime prevention, park improvements, and other vital services.

We MUST increase our Hotel Tax. This measure will NOT raise your taxes as a resident of San Mateo.

Measure W will help the City:

 - maintain streets, repair potholes, improve our infrastructure and enhance public facilities.  If we don't take care of it now, it will be a lot more expensive to repair in the future.

 - provide fast emergency response times for 911 calls. Help ensure we have enough police officers, firefighters, and paramedics to respond quickly and save lives.

 - enhance our parks and recreation facilities, including courts, fields, and playgrounds

 - prepare for public health emergencies like coronavirus, as well as wildfires, natural disasters, and large-scale emergencies.

ALL of this money will remain local and help improve our quality of life. None of the funds can be taken by Sacramento politicians.

VOTE YES! ON MEASURE W! 

 

/s/ Joe Goethals, Mayor

/s/ Eric Rodriguez, Deputy Mayor

/s/ Rick Bonilla, Council Member

/s/ Diane Papan, Council Member

/s/ Amourence Lee, Council Member

Arguments AGAINST

VOTE NO ON MEASURE W

No doubt the City of San Mateo as well as other cities are in a financial strain because of COVOID 19. Hotel occupancy has been devastated. Who knows when hotel occupancy will recover?

Increasing a tax during a difficult financial times is a poor strategy and sends a bad message. Hotel occupancy generates revenue to local businesses. Raising taxes does not increase occupancy. Increasing the hotel tax is a lose-lose situation for the city, the hotels, local businesses, and workers.

The City of San Mateo should be working with the hotels to make them healthy. Raising the hotel tax is sticking a finger in the eye of hotels, local businesses, and working people.

Working from home is working and business travel will probably never return to pre-COVOID-19 levels. Most surrounding cities have a 12-14% hotel tax. A possible strategy to increase occupancy in the City of San Mateo would be to reduce or cut the hotel tax altogether. The result would be a higher occupancy in the City of San Mateo and less in surrounding areas, more of our local businesses will stay open, and more people will have jobs. There is nothing worse than empty store fronts.

VOTE NO ON MEASURE W.

 

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Thomas Weismiller, Retired Army Officer

/s/ Maria Christina Laslwoski, Business Transformation Leader

/s/ Catherine Hart, Sales Rep 

Replies to Arguments FOR

VOTE NO ON MEASURE W

No doubt the City of San Mateo as well as other cities are in a financial strain because of COVOID 19. Hotel occupancy has been devastated. Who knows when hotel occupancy will recover?

Increasing a tax during a difficult financial times is a poor strategy and sends a bad message. Hotel occupancy generates revenue to local businesses. Raising taxes does not increase occupancy. Increasing the hotel tax is a lose-lose situation for the city, the hotels, local businesses, and workers.

The City of San Mateo should be working with the hotels to make them healthy. Raising the hotel tax is sticking a finger in the eye of hotels, local businesses, and working people.

Working from home is working and business travel will probably never return to pre-COVOID-19 levels. Most surrounding cities have a 12-14% hotel tax. A possible strategy to increase occupancy in the City of San Mateo would be to reduce or cut the hotel tax altogether. The result would be a higher occupancy in the City of San Mateo and less in surrounding areas, more of our local businesses will stay open, and more people will have jobs. There is nothing worse than empty store fronts.

VOTE NO ON MEASURE W.

 

/s/ Mark W.A. Hinkle, President, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association

/s/ Thomas Weismiller, Retired Army Officer

/s/ Maria Christina Laslwoski, Business Transformation Leader

/s/ Catherine Hart, Sales Rep 

 

For more information, please visit the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association: www.SVTAxpayers.org

Replies to Arguments AGAINST

The opponents of Measure W habitually oppose every measure on the ballot in San Mateo. They don’t know our needs or care about our community.

Here’s the truth:

Voting yes on Measure W will not increase taxes for San Mateo residents – it only applies to overnight hotel and short-term rental guests

.We need Measure W to maintain vital City services and ensure out-of-town visitors pay their fair share for using San Mateo’s streets, parks and emergency services.

Voting yes on Measure W approves a modest 2% increase in the City’s hotel tax to provide locally-controlled funding we need for critical services and to help our local economy rebound.

San Mateo’s hotel tax is actually lower than many neighboring cities having the same hotel tax as neighboring cities means we won’t get shortchanged and can maintain our quality of life here in San Mateo.

San Mateo’s budget has been hard-hit by COVID-19, and the City has already made serious cuts to reduce expenses. Measure W prevents further cuts, will only be used to fund essential services and can’t be taken away by the State.

We need to support the services and infrastructure so many rely on!

Keeping quality services inSan Mateo is good for local businesses, visitors and residents.

Voting yes on Measure W means you want:

Potholes and streets repaired

Fast emergency response times to 911 calls

Quality parks, playgrounds and recreational amenities

Improvements to reduce traffic and improve pedestrian safety

Voting yes on Measure W improves San Mateo’s quality of life without increasing your taxes!

 

/s/ Joe Goelthals, Mayor

/s/ Eric Rodriguez, Deputy Mayor

/s/ Rick Bonilla, Council member

/s/ Diane Papan, Council Member

/s/ Amourence Lee, Council Member 

Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your choices by navigating to 'My Choices'.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION