Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday June 7, 2016 — California Primary Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

California State AssemblyCandidate for District 24

Photo of Peter Ohtaki

Peter Ohtaki

Businessman/Menlo Park Councilmember
21,525 votes (19.8%)
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My Choices'.
For more in-depth information on this candidate, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.
Candidate has provided information.
Thank candidate for sharing their information on Voter's Edge.

My Top 3 Priorities

  • Ensure fiscal sustainability by applying budget surpluses for infrastructure and pension liabilities. Re-allocate high-speed rail funds to local transportation needs: Caltrain, traffic mitigation like grade separations, and BART upgrade.
  • Reform the state housing element mandate to improve transparency over housing quotas and flexibility for our cities and towns to build the type of housing that fits the character of our communities.
  • Encourage the state government to partner with Silicon Valley businesses to solve problems, instead of increasing fees, taxes and regulation on entrepreneurs and growing businesses.



Profession:Businessman, Menlo Park City Councilmember, 2013 Mayor
Vice President, Enterprise Incident Management, Regional Emergency Manager, Wells Fargo (2014–current)
Council Member, Menlo Park City Council — Elected position (2010–current)
Executive Director, California Resiliency Alliance (2010–2014)
Mayor, Menlo Park — Appointed position (2012–2013)
Project Director, Business Executives for National Security (2005–2010)
Director, Menlo Park Fire Protection District — Elected position (2007–2010)
Co-Founder and Chief Financial Officer, NetTV (1996–2005)


Stanford Business School M.B.A., Business and Finance (1987)
Harvard University B.A., Economics, magna cum laude (1983)


Peter Ohtaki was elected to the Menlo Park City Council in November 2010, selected by the Council as Mayor in 2013, and re-elected in 2014.  While on the Finance and Audit Committee, he balanced the city’s budget by paying down an unfunded pension liability, saving taxpayers $3.6 million in interest expense.  He co-chairs the city’s General Plan Update, was appointed the League of California Cities Housing, Community and Economic Development policy committee, and serves on several regional committees.

As Mayor, Peter helped attract a technology incubator to the city, and worked with Assemblyman Rich Gordon to pass legislation (AB1690) that modified the state Housing Element law giving flexibility for cities to include mixed use with housing.  Previously, he was elected to the Menlo Park Fire Protection District Board of Directors in 2007, serving as Board President in 2010.

Peter is Vice President and Regional Emergency Manager for Wells Fargo Bank.  Before Wells Fargo, Peter started the California Resiliency Alliance, a non-profit organization that brings businesses and government together in a public-private partnership to improve disaster resiliency. 

Peter was Chief Financial Officer a tech start-up in consumer electronics and education.  He worked in corporate finance at Morgan Stanley where he financed technology companies and helped take Cisco Systems public in 1990.

Peter grew up in Menlo Park, and graduated with a B.A. in Economics, magna cum laude, from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.  Peter and his wife have three children.

Who gave money to this candidate?


Total money raised: $27,636

Top contributors that gave money to support the candidate, by organization:

Employees of OHTAKI, PETER I.
Employees of United States Department of Energy
Employees of Anton Development Company
Employees of Wells Fargo
Employees of Apple
Employees of Applied Strategies
Employees of California Institute of Technology
Employees of Deborah Vogt (Self-Employed)
Employees of Royce Law Firm

More information about contributions

By State:

California 95.18%
Michigan 4.08%
New York 0.37%
Washington 0.37%

By Size:

Large contributions (97.67%)
Small contributions (2.33%)

By Type:

From organizations (0.93%)
From individuals (99.07%)
Source: MapLight analysis of data from the California Secretary of State.

Political Beliefs

Political Philosophy

I grew up here as Silicon Valley became the land of opportunity.  But traffic jams, expensive housing, and rising taxes are making this opportunity harder to realize.

Silicon Valley Deserves Better from Sacramento 

Our region is the engine to California’s economy and state budget surplus. This surplus should be used for local infrastructure improvements and the state’s pension liability.  Why spend $64 billion on high-speed rail to Bakersfield, when it’s so difficult to get to work each day?  These funds are needed to improve Caltrain and address local traffic problems.

Rather than embracing technology to solve problems, Sacramento taxes and regulates innovation and growing businesses. Sacramento imposes unfunded mandates on our cities, rather than encouraging local control and decisions that fit our communities’ character.

Bi-Partisan Problem Solver 

As a former tech startup CFO, I’m considered the “numbers guy” on the Menlo Park City Council, and balanced the city budget, rezoned areas for tech/biotech growth, and funded infrastructure projects.

·         When state housing regulations stood in the way of a grocery store, I worked with Assemblyman Rich Gordon to pass legislation (AB1690) with bipartisan support.  Now, all California cities have more flexibility in building housing.

·         After years of a “structural deficit”, I balanced the city’s budget by paying down an unfunded pension liability.  Now, taxpayers are saving $3.6 million.  

Silicon Valley’s mantra has been “smaller, faster, and better.”   Let’s bring innovative solutions to Sacramento.  I sincerely appreciate your vote.  Please visit

Position Papers

Silicon Valley Techies Wish We Could Ignore Sacramento. Here’s Five Reasons We Can’t.


Who in the Valley has time to screw around with California state politics?

You’re an engineer, you’re a marketer, you’re a founder, you’re a financier. You’re here at Valley Ground Zero — Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Los Altos, wherever — and work is all-encompassing and for a diligent member of the tech ecosystem like you, life in Northern California is pretty darn good right now.

Sacramento? A wide spot on the way to Tahoe. Last chance to get In-N-Out in California. Full of suits and rent-seeking ideologues and utterly disconnected from — and incapable of affecting — your life. Right? 

Not right. It’s crucially important this year for tech industry participants to understand that key elements of the Valley’s economic foundation are at risk in the California state legislature. If that foundation starts to crack, your foundation starts to crack. The assumptions you’ve built a career and your lifestyle on may no longer be a given.

Techie First, Politics Second


I’m part of every verbal Venn Diagram I just outlined above. I’m a tech finance guy — a serial CFO. I grew up in Menlo Park when it was just a sleepy suburb of San Francisco, got my MBA here, and have seen Silicon Valley become the best example of creative capitalism in the world. It’s where disruptive innovation and risk-taking are celebrated and rewarded.

I like this place so much that I ran for city council in 2010 and served as Menlo Park’s mayor in 2013. In those roles, I’ve had to pay very close attention to what’s been going on over there under the capitol dome.

Having done so, I’d like to give you five critical reasons you need to devote some brain cycles to — and plan to vote in — this year’s state elections:

1. Sacramento is targeting our innovative companies with excess regulation and aggressive new taxation.

You know that California’s finances have been in pretty rough shape for a pretty long time. That’s got the Sacramento political power structure looking for ways to drain revenue out of prosperous companies and new industry sectors.

Remember last year’s huge Airbnb-focused Proposition F in San Francisco? It was a desperation move funded by old economy interests to hobble a powerful tech-enabled new competitor. It lost, but only after costing Airbnb $8 million and a huge amount of distraction.

Don’t think that was the end of the story, though. Next up: Uber, by way of a push to classify its contractors as full-time employees.

In short, there’s planning and action under way in Sacramento that would tax, regulate, and otherwise hobble all sorts of innovative Valley companies, and there’s a huge and well-funded lobbying effort by entrenched interests egging the legislature on to do it.

If you want to see tech companies lashed down like Gulliver by the Lilliputians, just do nothing and watch.

2. California is headed toward potential runaway taxation from a legislative supermajority.

In 2010 we all passed Proposition 16, which amended our constitution to say tax increases needed a two-thirds vote of the legislature to pass. The current legislature is one vote shy of a Democratic supermajority, and in Sacramento, that supermajority is overwhelmingly in favor of higher taxes. On just about everything and everyone.

We’ve already had an onslaught of increased “user fees” — thinly disguised tax increases — but with Governor Brown at the helm and a potentially unstoppable legislative supermajority, expect tax rates to spike on both income and capital gains, and pretty much every other honey pot the legislature can jam its hands into.

They’re seeking to raise commercial property tax rates sharply and apply sales taxes for the first time ever to services. So you deal attorneys and VC’s, prepare to open an account with the Board of Equalization. Consumers, get ready for new taxes on any cloud-based services you buy.

And those hard-won equity dollars you’ve sweated and strained for? You’ll be fine…as long as you don’t want to, you know, hold onto them.

3. Valley traffic mitigation? Sorry, no.

Finding yourself stuck in traffic more and more these days? Governor Brown doesn’t care. He’s a flashy high speed rail guy. $64 billion for a bullet train to Bakersfield.

Problem: There are lots of ways to get Bakersfield, and frankly, not that many people from the Valley who are trying to get there.

Getting to your office, on the other hand, or, say, home to see your kids at night, is something a lot of people in the Valley want to do. You don’t have to be a car fiend to think we ought to be spending money to renovate BART and upgrade Caltrain.

But unless you’re a believer in autonomous cars sitting gridlocked in formation, the bottlenecks that need attention and dollars are local — not in Bakersfield.

4. Huge, looming public pension liability disaster.

Public employee unions hold massive sway in Sacramento. While public servants are largely good people doing important work, right now their pension and benefit costs are wildly out of control.

California’s facing $60 billion in pension obligations without funds lined up to pay them. Working out a deal that doesn’t sacrifice taxpayers on the altar of public employee pensions is going to require legislators who are beholden to those taxpayers and not to union political bosses. And if it’s not dealt with now, the tax increases that will be necessary in the near future will dwarf what Californians have ever seen before.

Do you have a big guaranteed pension at your tech company? Of course not. It’s not the way things work in the 21st century. Unless you work for the State of California, that is — and then all the rest of us are forced to cash checks that previous legislatures wrote at the behest of public employee union bosses — without worrying that were no funds to pay them.

5. Government reform and modernization.

Did you know that employees at the state’s Employment Development Division — responsible for helping unemployed Californians find new jobs — are prevented from using LinkedIn?

You read that right. The people responsible for putting out-of-work Californians back in productive jobs is prevented from using the most powerful recruiting and job seeking website there is.

And of course it’s a Valley company to boot.


Why? Because the California state government is a creaky Industrial Age machine that is wildly behind the technology of our times — the technology we here in the Valley have helped create and commercialize.

Yes, I’d like to go to Sacramento on your behalf and see what we can get done for California and The Valley.

I’m running as a Republican for the District 24 seat in the California State Assembly. As I said, I’m a Valley guy, a business guy, a numbers guy. I’m a bi-partisan problem solver, and I’ve demonstrated that time and time again working to solve practical problems and quality of life issues in Menlo Park.

I want to go to Sacramento to represent our assembly district, which runs from Woodside and Menlo Park all the way down to Sunnyvale and Los Altos Hills. I want to give the Valley and its economy a voice and be its advocate in the legislature.

Our economic ecosystem — our community — has become the very center of the universe in the business world. The societal transformation all of us have helped unleash is opening up new markets and creating new business models that are driving real wealth creation.

It’s not greedy to want this very special place, this amazing, world-changing community — to continue to thrive.

I believe I can help make that happen if enough of my fellow and like-minded techies pay attention and vote.

Unlike the State of California, I use LinkedIn, so you can find more on my background here.

The primary’s in June. Hope you can make it.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.