Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Get the facts before you vote.
Brought to you by
MapLight
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Tuesday November 8, 2022 — California General Election
Invest in unbiased information

With your support, we can reach and inform more voters.

Donate now to spread the word.

Local

City of San Diego
Measure B Ordinance - Majority Approval Required

To learn more about measures, follow the links for each tab in this section. For most screenreaders, you can hit Return or Enter to enter a tab and read the content within.

Election Results

Passed

203,223 votes yes (50.5%)

199,384 votes no (49.5%)

100% of precincts reporting (850/850).

427,507 ballots counted.

Shall the San Diego Municipal Code be amended so that all City residents receive comparable trash, recycling, and other solid waste management services, by allowing the City to recover its cost of providing these services to eligible residential properties, which could allow the City to provide additional services, such as weekly recycling, bulky item pickup, and curbside container replacement and delivery, at no extra charge?

What is this proposal?

Pros & Cons — Unbiased explanation with arguments for and against

Information provided by Jeanne Brown & Diana Crews, volunteers with the League of Women Voters of San Diego

The Question

Should the City of San Diego be able to end free trash pickup for certain households?

The Situation

This measure would amend the municipal code commonly known as the People’s Ordinance, which governs solid waste management services in the City of San Diego, including the collection, transfer, transportation, recycling and disposal of solid waste such as trash, recyclables, organic waste, and other waste.

The People’s Ordinance was adopted as a citizens’ initiative in 1919. It required the City to collect all refuse (solid waste) generated within City limits. This Ordinance authorized the City to impose a fee to cover the cost of collection, transportation and disposal of such waste, which it never did.

In 1981 and 1986, City voters amended the People’s Ordinance to limit the amount of waste the City was required to collect and to prohibit the City from charging a fee to properties that received City-provided solid waste management services. Properties not eligible for City-provided solid waste management services arrange and pay for the cost of their own solid waste management services.

The Proposal

This measure asks voters to consider another amendment to the People’s Ordinance that would allow the City to charge a fee for City-provided solid waste management service to eligible properties.

Fiscal effect

This measure does not impose any fees. The measure would only allow the City to charge a fee for solid waste services, as the municipal code currently prohibits this practice. Any fee that the City would levy for solid waste services would be prohibited from exceeding the cost to provide services, and would follow the Proposition 218 process, including a Cost of Service Study, public noticing, and a public hearing on the fee prior to approval.

Supporters say

  • San Diego operates under a 103-year old law that created a deeply unfair, fiscally irresponsible, and environmentally unsustainable system.
  • Measure B will fix this broken and unfair system so San Diego can start delivering better services for all of us, like bulky item pickup and free replacement of broken trash bins.

 

Supporters: 

Sean Elo-Rivera, San Diego City Council President
Joe LaCava, San Diego City Council Member
Nicole Capretz, Founder & CEO, Climate Action Campaign
Kim Knox, President, League of Women Voters of San Diego

Opponents say

  • If Measure B passes, city politicians will be able to charge twice for trash service - costing you $350-500 more per year.
  • If they want to restore “fairness” all they need to do is go back to complying with the People’s Ordinance for all properties - as voters originally intended.

 

Opponents: 

Richard Rider, San Diego Tax Fighters
Carl DeMaio, Chairman, Reform California
Brian Jones, State Senator
Scott Sherman, Former Chair, City of San Diego Audit Committee

Details — Official information

Summary

Prepared by the City Attorney and published on the City Clerk's website.

BALLOT TITLE

Amendments to San Diego Municipal Code section 66.0127, Related to Solid Waste Management Services, commonly known as the People’s Ordinance.

BALLOT SUMMARY

This measure would amend the law commonly known as the People’s Ordinance found in San Diego Municipal Code section 66.0127. The People’s Ordinance governs solid waste management services in the City of San Diego (City), which include the collection, transfer, transportation, recycling, and disposal of solid waste such as trash, recyclables, organic waste, and other waste.

City voters adopted the People’s Ordinance as a citizens’ initiative in 1919, which required the City to collect all “refuse,” now generally referred to as “solid waste,” generated within City limits. The People’s Ordinance authorized the City to impose a fee to specifically cover the cost of collection, transportation, and disposal of such waste, which it never did.

In 1981, and again in 1986, City voters amended the People’s Ordinance to limit the amount of commercial and industrial waste the City was required to collect, and to prohibit the City from charging a fee to properties that received City-provided solid waste management services, among other changes. Properties not eligible for City-provided solid waste management services arrange and pay for the cost of their own solid waste management services.

This measure asks voters to consider a third amendment to the People’s Ordinance that, if adopted, would clarify eligibility and allow the City to charge a fee for City-provided solid waste management services to eligible single family residential properties and multi-family residential properties with up to four residences on a single lot.

Although this measure does not create or approve a fee for solid waste management services, it does allow the City Council to adopt a fee in the future. Under state law, the City Council would consider the imposition of any related City fee at a public meeting and any City fee could not exceed the City’s cost of providing the services.

The People’s Ordinance currently allows the City to enter private property to provide solid waste management services in an emergency. This amendment would allow the City to also enter private property to assist a resident under the Americans with Disabilities Act; for example, the City could help a resident with disabilities move trash collection bins to the curb. The amendment would also clarify the City’s authority to provide solid waste management services to City facilities, parks, beaches, and other City-managed properties.

The City Council placed the measure on the ballot. The measure will pass if it is approved by a majority vote of those qualified voters who vote on the measure. The amendments would take effect after the results of the election are certified by a resolution of the City Council.

 

PDF

Background

Prepared by the City Attorney and published on the City Clerk's website.

The City Council has directed the City Attorney to prepare a ballot title, summary, and impartial analysis of a measure that would amend the People’s Ordinance, a voter initiative codified at San Diego Municipal Code (SDMC or Municipal Code) Section 66.0127, related to solid waste management services, which the City Council voted to place on the November 2022 ballot. (See Resolution R-314245, adopted July 25, 2022).

The measure seeks voter approval to amend the Municipal Code by amending Chapter 6, Article 6, Division 1, section 66.0127.

The City Council adopted San Diego Ordinance O-21507 on July 25, 2022, to submit the measure to the voters on the November 8, 2022, Municipal Special Election ballot.

Impartial analysis / Proposal

Prepared by the City Attorney and published on the City Clerk's website.

CITY ATTORNEY’S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS

In 1919, City of San Diego (City) voters approved a citizens’ initiative known as the People’s Ordinance, which required the City to collect all “refuse,” now generally referred to as “solid waste,” generated within City limits, and to impose a fee to cover the cost of providing collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste, which it never did. City voters later amended the People’s Ordinance to prohibit the City from charging a fee to properties that received solid waste management services from the City.

Today, the People’s Ordinance requires the City to collect, transport, and dispose of solid waste from certain residential properties at least once each week and prohibits the City from charging a fee for these services. Solid waste includes trash, recyclables, organic waste, and other waste. The People’s Ordinance also prohibits the City from collecting nonresidential waste, which includes commercial and industrial waste, except under limited circumstances, and generally prohibits the City from entering private property to provide solid waste management services except in a public emergency.

Under existing law, eligible residential properties receive City-provided services funded by the City’s General and Recycling Funds, whereas properties not eligible for City-provided solid waste management services must arrange and pay for the cost of their own services.

If adopted, this measure would amend the language in the People’s Ordinance to clarify eligibility and authorize the City to charge a fee for City-provided solid waste management services to eligible single family residential properties and multi-family residential properties with up to four residences on a single lot.

This measure would allow the City Council to establish a fee for City-provided solid waste management services at a future date. Before the City could adopt a fee, the City would be required to conduct a study to determine the City’s cost to provide the services. Under state law, the fee charged by the City could not exceed the City’s cost to provide the services and would be adopted at a public meeting. Any proposed fee would be subject to the majority protest procedures under the California Constitution and would require City Council approval, through the same procedures used for sewer or water rate increases. The fee could include extra related services or materials such as replacement containers.

The measure would clarify that the City may provide solid waste management services, to City facilities, parks, beaches, and City-managed property, using City employees or hired contractors.

The measure would allow the City to enter private property to assist residents with solid waste management services under the Americans with Disabilities Act and would delete outdated language regarding hold harmless agreements and disposal fees.

This measure was proposed by members of the City Council, who voted to place it on the ballot. If approved by a majority of the qualified voters voting on the measure, the Municipal Code would be amended after the election results are certified by the City Council.

 

[Transcribed by a Voter's Edge volunteer from a PDF published on the San Diego City Clerk's website.]

Financial effect

Prepared by the Independent Budget Analyst and published on the City Clerk's website.

FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CITY MEASURE ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 BALLOT

MEASURE B – AMENDS SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 66.0127 RELATED TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

This measure amends San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 6, Article 6, Division 1, Section 66.0127, also known as the People’s Ordinance, to provide the City the option to recover City costs for solid waste management services. This could relieve the City’s General Fund which currently covers the majority of these costs in addition to services like public safety, roads, parks, and libraries. The measure also recodifies the City’s responsibilities for waste management services. Passage of this measure would not immediately change any services or service levels, nor would it expand or shrink the number or types of residences currently receiving solid waste services from the City.

This measure alone will not impose any fees. The measure would only allow the City to charge a fee for solid waste services, as the municipal code currently prohibits this practice. Any fee that the City would levy for solid waste services would be prohibited from exceeding the cost to provide services, and would follow the Proposition 218 process, including development of a Cost of Service Study, public noticing, and a public hearing on the fee prior to approval. This process mirrors the process the City conducts for Water and Wastewater rates.

The Cost of Service Study would ultimately determine what fees could be levied, and would consider current costs as well as potential service level enhancements or other changes. The study would also determine a fee structure, as well as how low income or other discount programs, if any, would be structured. This process is expected to take approximately two years, and may cost the City approximately $1 million to complete. The study itself would be conducted by a consultant selected through a competitive bidding process.

While the fee is still to be determined, and while this measure does not impose a fee, it is reasonable to assume that at some point residents currently receiving solid waste services from the City would be charged a fee. According to City staff, up to approximately $79.2 million in costs in the FY 2023 Adopted Budget could be covered by a fee if such a fee were currently allowed. This includes $58.7 million from the General Fund, which could be redirected to other core services such as public safety, parks and libraries. A best estimate of what this fee would be at this time, assuming the City only recovers costs for services it currently provides and potential costs to bill and collect fee revenue, ranges from $23 to $29 per month per customer. This range is similar to the fees charged by other peer cities that offer similar services (see IBA Report 21-23 at https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/iba-report-21-23.pdf). Given that a Cost of Service Study could take several years to complete, and the costs to provide this service may increase over the next several years, the actual fee levied could be higher. Conversely, if the City elects to subsidize some portion of the costs to provide solid waste services, the actual fee levied could be lower.

 

PDF

Published Arguments — Arguments for and against

Arguments FOR

ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE B

Measure B fixes an unfair law from 1919 San Diego operates under a 103-year old law that created a deeply unfair, fiscally irresponsible, and environmentally unsustainable system. If your home is an apartment or condo, the city provides you no trash collection service. You are forced to pay for it yourself.

This outdated law also severely limits the types of services the city can provide, forcing homeowners to go through an expensive and time-consuming process to replace broken trash bins even when broken by City trucks.

San Diego is the only city in the country with such a law. It hurts all San Diegans and must be changed.

Measure B will fix this broken and unfair system so San Diego can start delivering better services for all of us, like bulky item pickup and free replacement of broken trash bins.

Voting YES vote on Measure B will:

  • Guarantee free trash and recycling bins, delivered to you by the City.
  • Allow the City to provide new trash services, such as bulky item pickup and weekly recycling.
  • Provide additional resources to clean up trash in public places such as parks, canyons and around homeless encampments.
  • End the practice of forcing apartment residents to pay more than others.
  • Ensure short-term vacation rentals and “mini-dorms” pay their fair share toward City services like everyone else.
  • Enable San Diego to achieve our Zero Waste and Climate Action Plan goals.

With Measure B, we can all do our part to ensure San Diegans receive the world-class public services they expect and deserve.

Vote YES on Measure B!

SEAN ELO-RIVERA
San Diego City Council President

JOE LACAVA
San Diego City Councilmember

NICOLE CAPRETZ
Founder & CEO, Climate Action Campaign

KIM KNOX
President, League of Women Voters of San Diego

 

PDF

— Arguments are the opinions of their authors. Published on the City Clerk's website.

Arguments AGAINST

ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B

STOP THE GARBAGE TAX
COSTS $350-500 PER YEAR
DON’T LET POLITICIANS CHARGE YOU TWICE

Be careful! City politicians are trying to fool voters into approving Measure B by putting a misleading ballot title on it. Measure B is actually a massive tax hike.

We Can’t Afford Another Tax Hike

If Measure B passes, city politicians will be able to charge twice for trash service — costing you $350-500 more per year!

Specifically, Measure B amends the Municipal Code, replacing “there shall be no City fee … charged for [trash] service” with “the City may charge” a fee.

San Diegans already have one of the highest cost of living burdens in the nation and we should not be adding to the existing burdens of working families with this costly Garbage Tax.

You Already Pay for Trash Services

Politicians say trash services are currently “free” — but that is completely false. In fact, voters passed the People’s Ordinance in 1919 to direct the City to earmark a portion of existing property tax revenues to provide the service. This policy of using your existing tax assessment for trash service was reaffirmed by voters in 1981 and 1986.

If Measure B passes, San Diegans will in essence be charged twice for trash service.

Politicians Should Repeal Their Unfair Policy

Politicians say it's “unfair” that some developments in the city are required to pay for private trash service while single family homes get use of the city’s trash service. We agree — but it was the city politicians themselves that imposed this so-called unfair policy on those developments. If they want to restore “fairness” all they need to do is go back to complying with the People’s Ordinance for all properties — as voters originally intended.

VOTE NO ON MEASURE B

RICHARD RIDER
Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters

CARL DEMAIO
Chairman, Reform California

BRIAN JONES
State Senator

SCOTT SHERMAN
Former Chair, City of San Diego Audit Committee

 

PDF

— Arguments are the opinions of their authors. Published on the City Clerk's website.

More information

Contact Info

Yes on Measure B
Yes on SD Measure B
No on Measure B
Not available.
Use tabs to select your choice. Use return to create a choice. You can access your choices by navigating to 'My Choices'.

Please share this site to help others research their voting choices.

PUBLISHING: SERVER:PRODUCTION